The objective of this study was the development of a model to predict whether a consumer would use a product safely as a function of sixteen different individual variables. Subjects were presented with four consumer products to use in an experimental setting where the true purpose of the study was concealed. Discriminant analysis was used to develop a prediction model to classify subjects into categories of safe or unsafe behavior. Prediction accuracy ranged from 68–86 percent for different types of behavior. The research illustrated which variables are important in determining whether a product will be used safely and has implications for product design, warnings, instructions for use and training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DorrisA.PurswellJ., “Warnings and Human Behavior: Implications for the Design of Product Warnings”, Journal of Products Liability, Vol. 1, 1977.
2.
DorrisA.TabriziM. F., “Consumer Perception of Product Safety: An Empirical Evaluation”, Journal of Products Liability, Vol. 2, 1978.
3.
GodfreyS., “Warning Messages: Will the Consumer Bother to Look”, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting, 1983.
4.
SchwartzD., “The Impact of Product Hazard Information on Consumer Buying Decisions: A Policy Capturing Approach”, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 22nd Annual Meeting, 1978.
5.
SlovicP., “Perceived Risk: Psychlogical Factors and Social Implications”, The Assessment and Perception of Risk, Royal Society of London, 1980.
6.
WrightP.“Some Factors Determining when Instructions will be Read”, Ergonomics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1982.
7.
ZuckermanM., “Interest and Preference Test”, Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal, Halstead Press Division of Wiley, New York, 1979.
