This study assessed the effects of signal regularity upon sensing and decision making in simultaneous and successive vigilance tasks. The results indicated that signal regularity enhances perceptual sensitivity (A') and thereby seems to “tune” the perceptual system. The vigilance decrement reflected a drop in perceptual sensitivity over time in both tasks. Implications for a recently developed vigilance task taxonomy were explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ.A.BoulterL.R. (1964). Spatial and temporal uncertainty as determinants of vigilance performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 127–131.
2.
BakerC.H. (1959). Towards a theory of vigilance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 35–42.
3.
DaviesD.R.TuneG.S. (1969). Human vigilance performance (p. 207). New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc.
4.
DeeseJ. (1955). Some problems in the theory of vigilance. Psychological Review, 52, 359–368.
5.
DemberW.N.JoshiA.WarmJ.S.ScerboM.W. (1985, November). Effects of event rate and spatial uncertainty on performance in simultaneous and successive vigilance tasks. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
6.
DemberW.N.WarmJ.S. (1979). Psychology of perception (2nd ed.) (pp. 335–338). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7.
DittmarM.L.WarmJ.S.DemberW.N. (1985). Effects of knowledge of results on performance in successive and simultaneous vigilance tasks: A signal detection analysis. In EbertsR.E.EbertsC.G. (Eds.), Trends in ergonomics/human factors II (pp. 195–202). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland).
8.
EganJ.P.GreenbergG.Z.SchulmanA.I. (1961). Interval of time uncertainty in auditory detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 771–778.
9.
HatfieldJ.L.LoebM. (1968). Sense mode and coupling in a vigilance task. Perception & Psychophysics, 4, 29–36.
10.
KahnemanD.TreismanA. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In ParasuramanR.DaviesD.R. (Eds.) Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). London: Academic Press.
11.
LanzettaT.M.WarmJ.S.DemberW.N.BerchD.B. (1985). Information processing load and the event rate function in sustained attention. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
12.
LisperH.O.TornrosJ. (1974). Effects of inter-signal interval regularity on increase in reaction time in a one-hour auditory monitoring task. Acta Psychologica, 38, 455–460.
13.
LoebM.AlluisiE.A. (1984). Theories of vigilance. In WarmJ.S. (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 179–205). Chichester: Wiley, Ltd.
14.
LoebM.BinfordJ.R. (1971). Modality, difficulty and ‘coupling’ in vigilance behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 529–541.
15.
McDermottB.E. (1985). Information processing demands in sustained attention. Unpublished masters' thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
ParasuramanR. (1973). Vigilance and attention: A psychophysiological study. Unpublished masters' thesis. University of Aston at Birmingham.
18.
ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (1986, June). Capacity demands of successive and simultaneous discrimination tasks. Paper presented at the Third Mid-Central Ergonomics/Human Factors Conference, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
19.
ScerboM.W. (1985). Event asynchrony and sustained attention. Unpublished masters' thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
20.
WarmJ.S.DemberW.N.ChinK.DittmarM.L.ZieleniewskiA.M. (1986, April). Effects of head restraint on the performance of successive and simultaneous vigilance tasks. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Knoxville, Tenn.
21.
WarmJ.S.EppsB.D.FergusonR.P. (1974). Effects of knowledge of results and signal regularity on vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 272–274.
22.
WarmJ.S.JerisonH.J. (1984). The psychophysics of vigilance. In WarmJ.S. (Ed.). Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 15–59). London: Wiley.
