Black's Law Dictionary, (1968), Revised Fourth Edition, St Paul, MN, West Publ. Co.
2.
FreudS. (1906). Psycho-analysis and the ascertaining of truth in courts of law. Clinical Papers and Papers on Technique, Collected Papers (1959), 2, 13–24. New York: Basic Books.
3.
HealyW. (1915). Honesty; A study of the causes and treatment of dishonesty among chiIdren.Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
4.
KurkeM.I. (1980), Forensic psychology; A threat and a response. Professional Psychol., 11, 72–77.
5.
KurkeM.I. (1986a). Anatomy of product liability/personal injury litigation. In KurkeM. I.MeyerR. G., Psychology in product liability and personal injury litigation. New YorK, Remisphere Publ. Co.
6.
KurkeM.I. (1986b). Multispecialty forensic psychology teams and the consulting forensic psychologist. In KurkeM.I.MeyerR.G., Psychology in product liability and Personal injury litigation. New York, Hemisphere Publ. Co.
7.
MunsterbergH. (1908). On the witness stand.New York: Doubleday.
SchroederO., (1977). Assessment of the forensic sciences professions: III. A legal study concerning the forensic sciences personnel (National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice). Washington DC, US Government Printing Office.
10.
Sub-committee on Specialty Criteria (Dec. 14 1981), Manual for the identification and continued recognition of specialties in psychology., Washington, DC, American Psychol. Assn.
11.
TappJ.L. (1976). Psychology and the law: An overture. Ann. Rev. Psychol., 27359–404.
12.
WatsonJ.B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychol. Rev., 20, 159–177.
13.
WigmoreJ.H. (1909). Professor Munsterberg and the psychology of testimony: Being a report on the case of Cokestone v. Munsterberg. Ill. Law Rev., 3, 399–445.