Advanced simulators and other training systems have been designed to replicate as realistically as possible various operational systems and environments. The rationale for this particular design goal is to attain sufficient fidelity for maximum training transfer to the real world. Yet, effective training may not only depend on attaining adequate fidelity, but also upon how a given training system is used to achieve specific learning outcomes. This paper identifies some of the salient problems with training system design and use, and discusses possible solutions for improving their training value based on incorporating instructional support capabilities and using prescriptive instructional methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AagardJ.A.BaileyR. (1984). Learning guidelines and algorithms for types of training objectives (TAEG Report No. 23). Orlando: Naval Training Systems Center.
2.
BaileyJ.S.HughesR.G.JonesW.E. (1980). Application of backward chaining to air–to–surface weapons delivery training (AFHRL–TR–63). Williams AFB, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
3.
CharlesJ.P. (1985). Development of an instructor station design guide. In Proceedings of the 7th Interservice/Industry Training Equipment Conference.
4.
DansereauD. (1978). The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In O'NeilH.F.Jr. (Ed.) Learning Strategies. New York: Academic Press.
5.
GagneR.M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6.
GustafsonK.L. (1981). Survey of instructional development models. Syracuse, N.Y.: ERIC Clearing House on Information Resources (ED–059–629).
7.
HaysR.T. (1983). Research issues in training device design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting.
8.
LinternG.A. (1984). A perceptual learning model of skill transfer for manual control (NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 81–C–01). Westlake Village, CA: Canyon Research Group, Inc.
9.
ManeA.M. (1984). Acquisition of perceptual motor skill: Adaptive and part-whole training. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting.
10.
MerrillM. D. (1980). Learner control in computer-based learning. Computers and Education, 4, 77–95.
11.
MerrillM.D.KeletyJ.C.WilsonB. (1981). Elaboration theory and cognitive psychology. Instructional Science, 10, 217–235.
12.
MerrillM.D.RiegeluthCM.FaustG.W. (1979). The instructional quality profile: A curriculum evaluation and design tool. In O'NeilH.F.Jr. (Ed.), Procedures for instructional systems development. New York: Academic Press.
13.
PolzellaD.J. (1983). Aircrew training devices: Utility and utilization of advanced instructional features (AFHRL–TR–83–22). Williams AFB, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
14.
RiegeluthCM. (1981). (Ed.) Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Publishers.
15.
RiegeluthC.M. (1984). The evolution of instructional science: Toward a common knowledge base. Educational Technology.
16.
RigneyJ.W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In O'NeilH.F.Jr. (Ed.), Learning Strategies. New York: Academic Press.
17.
RobertsonG.McCrackenD.NewellA. (1981). The ZOG approach to man-machine communication. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 14, 461–488.
18.
SchaefferR.H. (1985). A comparative analysis of ISD Procedural models. In Proceedings of the 7th Interservice/Industry Training Equipment Conference.
19.
SchmidtR.A. (1975). Motor Skills. New York: Harper and Row.
20.
SempleCA.CottonJ.C.SullivanD.J. (1980). Aircrew Training devices: Instructional features (AFHRL–TR–80–58). Brooks AFB, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
21.
SingerM.J.HaysR.T. (1985). New directions in training simulator research (ARI Report 1389). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences.
22.
SingerR.N. (1978). Motor skills and learning strategies. In O'NeilH.F.Jr. (Ed.) Learning Strategies. New York: Academic Press.
23.
SpearsW.D. (1983). Processes of skill performance: A foundation for the design and use of training equipment (NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 78–C–011304). Orlando: Naval Training Equipment Center.
24.
StelmachG.E. (1982). Motor control and motor learning: The closed-loop perspective. In KelsoJ. A.Human motor behavior: An introduction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Publishers.
25.
WightmanD.CLinternG. (1984). Part-task training of tracking in manual control (NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 81–C–0105–2). Orlando: Naval Training Equipment Center.
26.
WulfeckW.H.EllisJ.A.RichardsR.E.WoodN.D.MerrillM.D. (1978). The instructional quality inventory: Introduction and overview (Special Report No. 29–3). San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
