Two distinctly different methods of expressing database queries were compared to evaluate differences in their difficulty. One method was a standard database query language, SQL, while the second method only required subjects to be able to make use of tables representing sample databases. Clear differences emerged in subject performance. Regression techniques demonstrated an association between performance and a set of cognitive skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChamberlinD. D.BoyceR. F. (1974). SEQUEL: A structured English query language. Proceedings of the ACM SIGFIDET Workshop. New York: ACM, 249–264.
2.
CoxD. R. (1970). Analysis of binary data. London: Methuen & Co., LTD.
3.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H.DermenD. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4.
GomezL. M.EganD. EBowersC. (1986). Learning to use a text editor: Some learner characteristics that predict success. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–23.
5.
Nelson - Denny Reading Test, Form D. (1973). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
ReisnerP. (1981). Human factors studies of database query languages: A survey and assessment. Computing Surveys, 13, 13–31.
7.
ReisnerP. (1977). Use of psychological experimentation as an aid to development of a query language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-3, 218–229.
8.
ThomasJ. C.GouldJ. D. (1975). A psychological study of query by example. Proc. Nat. Comput. Conf., 44. Arlington, VA: AFIPS Press, 333–352.
9.
WilliamsM. D. (1984). What makes RABBIT run?Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 21, 333–352.
10.
ZloofM. M. (1975). Query by Example. Proc. Nat. Comput. Conf., 44. Arlington, VA: AFIPS Press, 431–438.
