The accuracy and speed of proofreading was unaffected by a wide range of visual angle (at least 16–36 deg). Text on most computer displays and on 8–1/2 × 11 in. paper subtend visual angles within this range—even with typical variations in reading distance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GouldJ. D.GrischkowskyN.Doing the same work with hardcopy and with cathode ray tube (CRT) computer terminals. Human Factors, 1984, 26, 323–338.
2.
KakA. V.Relationships between readability of printed and CRT-displayed text. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society–25th Annual Meeting, 1981, 137–140.
3.
KrukR. S.MuterP.Reading of continuous text on video screens. Human Factors, 1984, 26, 339–345.
4.
KuceraH.FrancisW. W.Computational analysis of present-day American English.Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press, 1967.
5.
MoskelS.ErnoJ.ShneidermanB.Screen and charcter selection affects the readability of text on a monitor. (As cited by MillsC. B.WeldonL. J. Reading from computer screens. Center for Automation Research Technical Report, CAR-TR-94, University of Maryland, 1984).
6.
MorrisonR. E., Retinal image size and the perceptual span in reading. In Eye Movements in Reading.Academic Press: New York, 1983, 31–40.
7.
MorrisonR. E.RaynerK.Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Perception & Psychophysics, 1981, 30(4), 395–396.
8.
MuterP.LatremouilleS. A.TreunietW. C.BeamP.Extended readings of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors, 1982, 24, 501–508.
9.
O'ReganJ. K.Elementary perceptual and eye movement control processes in reading. In Eye Movements in Reading. Academic Press: New York, 1983, 121–139.
10.
PatersonD. A.TinkerM. A.How to Make Type Readable.Harper: New York, 1940.
11.
WrightP.LickorishA.Proofreading texts on screen and paper. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1983, 2(3), 227–235.
