This paper examines the use of written simulations in accident research and safety training, Several accident studies conducted by the author, using written simulations, are described. This is followed by a brief discussion of the principal advantages and disadvantages of this method of simulation. The potential of written simulations in safety training is also addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BashookP. G. (1982). Written simulations: From paper format to computer format and beyond. National Society for Performance and Instruction Journal, 14, 12–15.
2.
BurgerJ. M. (1981). Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive attribution hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 496–512.
3.
DeJoyD. M. (1985, March). Supervisory response to multi-causal workplace accidents. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta.
4.
DeJoyD. M. (in press-a). Attributional processes and hazard control management in industry. Journal of Safety Research.
5.
DeJoyD. M. (in press-b). Attribution of responsibility for alcohol-related motor vehicle collisions: Summary report. 29th Annual Proceedings-American Association for Automotive Medicine.
6.
DeJoyD. M.KlippelJ. A. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for alcohol related near-miss accidents. Journal of Safety Research, 15, 107–115.
7.
GreenS. G.MitchellT. R. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 429–458.
8.
HenryD. V. (1985). Supervisory responses to poor safety performance: Effects of outcome severity, causal stability, and locus of control. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Georgia, Athens.
9.
MitchellT. R.WoodR. E. (1980). Supervisors' responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25123–138.
10.
ShaverK. G. (1970). Defensive-attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.
