Abstract
Because of its central role in system development, workload measurement has been extensively researched. These efforts have produced a variety of workload assessment techniques, many of which can be classified as either subjective, physiological, or behavioral measures. These categories of measures can vary along several dimensions that can be used as criteria in selection of a technique for a particular application. The proposed selection criteria include the sensitivity, diagnosticity, and intrusiveness associated with a technique. Different stages of system design can require techniques that differ on the noted dimensions. Since no technique is capable of meeting all of the applicable criteria, a comprehensive approach to workload assessment will require a battery of subjective, physiological, and behavioral measures. Future research dealing with comparative evaluation of the various assessment techniques along the noted dimensions will be required in order to refine workload metric selection criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
