A unique approach which combined anthropometric data, human anatomical models, and artistic renderings was used to synthesize male and female manikin models representing the U.S. general population. The derivation of dimensions, joint locations and reach envelopes are discussed and scale drawings of the 5th percentile female and 15th percentile male manikins are presented. These manikins were used to derive console ergonomic requirements for next-generation air traffic controller workstations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChurchillE.ChurchillT.DowningK.ErskinP.LaubachL. L.McConvilleJ. T.Anthrogometric Source BOOK volumne II; A Handbook of Annthropometric Data1978.
2.
ChurchillE.ChurchillT.McConvilleJ.T.WhiteR. M.Anthropometry of Women of the U.S Army — 1977 Report 2 The Basic Univariate Statistics.
3.
ChurchillE.LaubachL. L.McConvilleJ.T.TebbettsI.Anihropometric Source Book Volume I; AnthropometrY for Designers1978.
GrandjeanE.HuntingW.PidermannM., VDT Workstation design: Prefered settings and their effects. Human Factors 1983, 25(2) 161–175.
7.
HoganB.J., Seating design can cause lower back problems. Design News 85–89 September 13, 1982.
8.
KleemanW.B.Jr., Airtraffic controller's chair evaluated for the Federal Aviation Administration. Human Factors Society Bulletin, December 1982.
9.
KroemerK. H. E.RobinetteJ. C., 1968Ergonomics in the design of office furniture - a review of European literature. Aerospace Medical Laboratory Report No: AMRL-TR 68–80.
10.
McConvilleJ. T.ChurchillE.ChurchillT.WhiteR.Anthropometry of Women of the U.S Army — 1977 Beport 5 Comparatiye Data for U.S Army Men.
11.
PhillipsM. D.BogardtA.PepperR.L., Female and Male Size, Strength and Performance: A reyiew of current literature. San Diego, CA; Naval Ocean Systems Center, NOSC-CR-107, November, 1981.
