Abstract
Subjective assessments of workload are becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of new systems. Two popular methods were compared in the present investigation: (1) the Subjective Workload Assessment Technique (SWAT) which was developed around the use of conjoint analysis to create interval scales, and (2) a technique under development at NASA that utilizes an individually weighted workload score from a set of nine bipolar ratings. Both methods were applied in a laboratory experiment that required rating a number of single- and dual-task trials of tracking and/or a spatial transformation task. The dual transformation-tracking task results were reviewed. The results for the two assessment techniques were remarkably similar, indicating that the subjective experience of workload is sufficiently robust to be resistant to variations in the measuring technique. Also, both subjective assessment techniques were successful in measuring the differences in task difficulty as indicated by a multivariate analysis of performance. Finally, the specific strengths and weaknesses of each assessment technique were reviewed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.