A methodology was described to revise program deficiencies in Army classroom training identified during training effectiveness evaluations. The baseline for its design approach was discussed. The revision methdology's content and structure was presented in detail.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BransonR. K.RaynerG. T.CoxJ. L.FurmanJ. P.KingF. J.HannumW. J.Interservice procedures for instructional systems development. (TRADOC Phamplet 350–30, 5 Volumes). Fort Monroe, Virginia: U. S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, 1975.
2.
CarterR. J.Methodologies for evaluating training products and processes. (Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 258–262). Santa Monica, California: The Human Factors Society, 1982.
3.
EllisJ. A.WulfeckW. H.II. The instructional quality inventory: IV. Job performance aid. (NPRDC Special Report 79–5). San Diego, California: U. S. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, 1978.
4.
EllisJ. A.WulfeckW. H.IIFredericksP. S.The instructional quality inventory: II. User's manual. (NPRDC Special Report 79–24). San Diego, California: U. S. Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, 1979.
5.
Harless Performance Guild.Guidelines for conducting a training program evaluation. (ARI Working Paper FKFU 80–1). Fort Knox, Kentucky: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Knox Field Unit, 1979.
6.
KristiansenD. M.A job aid for modifying ineffective and inefficient training programs. (ARI Research Product 81–17). Fort Knox, Kentucky: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Knox Field Unit, 1981.
7.
SpearsW. D.MaxeyJ. L.RoushM. D.Methodology for correcting deficiencies in training programs. (Seville Project Report PR 80–08). Pensacola, Florida: Seville Research Corporation, 1980.
