Design and implementation of military maintenance training systems can draw upon a number of lessons learned from a review of literature and past experience of applications of computer-based training technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BryanG.L.ReganJ.J.Training System Design. In Van CottH.P.KinkadeR.G. (Eds) Human Engineering Guide To Equipment Design.American Institutes for Research, Washington, D.C.1972.
2.
CarrollRobert J.GoodmanDonald L.HritzRohn J.ChiplockLori W.Final Draft, Logistical Support Handbook For Maintenance Trainers.Applied Sciences Associates Inc., Valencia, PA.Prepared for U.S. Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Technical Training Division, Lowry AFB, Colorado. August 1983.
3.
CicchinelliLouis F.HarmonKenneth R.KellerRobert A.Relative Cost and Training Effectiveness of the 6883 Converter/Flight Control Simulators As Compared To Actual Equipment. Fianal Report. Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Brooks AFB, Texas. December 1982.
4.
CrawfordAlice M.CrawfordKent S.“Simulation of Operational Equipment With a Computer-Based Instructional System: A Low Cost Training Technology.” Human Factors Journal.20, No. 2. April 1978. pp. 215–223.
5.
CreamBertram W.EggemeierThomas F.KleinGary A., “A Strategy For The Development of Training Devices”. Human Factors Journal.20, No. 2. April 1978, pp. 145–158.
6.
DeignanGerard M.SeagerLtcolKimballMajHorowitzCapt, “Comparative Evaluation of CAI with Programmed Text and Lecture Modes of Instruction in Three Air Force Medical Training Courses.”Seventh Symposium, Psychology in The Department of Defense, USAF Academy, Colorado. April 1980 pp. 193–197.
7.
FinkC. DennisShriverEdgar L.Simulators for Maintenance Training: Some Issues, Problems, And Areas for Future Research. Kinton, Incorporated, Alexandria, VA. AFHRL TR 78–27. Prepared for USAF Human Resources Laboratory, Technical Training Division, Lowry AFB, Colorado. July 1978.
8.
FitzpatrickJ.A.HritzRohn J.Acquiring Better Maintenance Trainers: Lessons Learned In the F-16 SAMT Study. Applied Sciences Associates, Valencia, PA. Prepared for U.S. Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Technical Training Division, Lowry AFB, Colorado. January 1983.
9.
HaysRobert T., Editor. “Research Issues In the Determination of Simulator Fidelity: Proceedings of the ARI Sponsored Workshop 23–24 July 1981”. Technical Report 547. U.S. Army, Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. November 1981.
10.
OrlanskyJesseStringJosephCost-Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instruction in Military Training. IDA Paper P-1375. Institute for Defense Analysis, Science and Technology Division. Prepared for Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. April 1979.
11.
OrlanskyJ.StringJ.The Performance of Maintenance Technicians on the Job. IDA Paper P-1597. Institute for Defense Analysis. Science and Technology Division. August 1981.
12.
SieckoNicholas A.“Micro-Computer Control of the EC 3 Training Device.”Conference on Micro Computers in Education and Training. Society for Applied Learning Technology. Warrington, VA. May 1979. pp. 54–62.
13.
SwopeWilliam M.GreenEric K.Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Instructional Systems Development Plan. Technical Memorandum 77–6. Training Analysis and Evaluation Group, Orlando, FL. July 1977.
14.
WetzelS.K.EllisJ.A.WulfeckW.H.IIMontagueW.E., The Status of Authoring Aids for Instructional Systems Development: An Analysis of Needs and Availability, SR 82–37 Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, CA. August 1982.
