A set of three experiments are described that examine the sources of information processing that produce a dissociation between subjective workload measures and performance. The results support a theory of the dissociation. Subjective measures are driven more by the number of tasks currently performed. Subjective measures are also less sensitive to resource competition than performance measures are. Factors that demand more resource investment improve performance, but these factors also increase subjective ratings of workload.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. (1984) Multivariate evaluation of workload, resources, and performance in dual task data. Proceedings, 28th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society..
2.
DerrickW. (1981) The relationship between processing resource and subjective dimensions of operator workload. Proceedings, 25th annual Meeting of the Human Factors society..
3.
DerrickW.WickensC. D. (1981) The processing demands of higher order manual control: Application of Additive Factors Methodology. Technical Report, Engineering Psychology Research Laboratory, University of Illinois.
4.
DerrickW.WickensC. D. (1984) A multiple processing resource explanation of the subjective dimensions of operator workload. Technical Report, Engineering Psychology Laboratory, University of Illinois.
5.
EricssonK.SimonH. (1980) Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–250.
6.
EggemeierF. T.CrabtreeM. S.ReidG. B. (1982) Subjective workload assessment in a memory update task. Proceedings, 26th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society..
7.
GillR.WickensC. D.DonchinE.ReidR. (1982) Pseudo-Quickening: A new display technique for the control of higher order systems. Proceeding, 26the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors society..
8.
GopherD.BrauneR. (1983) On the psychophysics of workload: Why bother with subjective measures?Proceedings, 2nd Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
9.
HauserJ. R.ChildressM. E.HartS. G. (1982) Rating consistency and component salience in subjective workload estimation. Proceedings, 18th Annual conference on Manual Control, U.S government Printing Office.
10.
HerronS. (1981) A case for early objective evaluation of candidate display formats. Proceedings, 24th Annual Meetings of the Human Factors Society..
11.
MorayN. (1982) Subjective mental workload. Human Factors, 24, 25–40.
12.
WickensC. D.DerrickW. (1981) Workload measurement and multiple resources. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics..
13.
WickensC. D.YehY. Y. (1983) The dissociation between subjective workload and performance: A multiple resource approach. Proceedings, 27th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society..
14.
WierwilleW. W.WilligesR. (1978) Survey and analysis of operator workload assessment techniques. Blacksburg, Virginia: Systemetric, Inc. Report No. S-78-101.
15.
WierwilleW. W.ConnorS. A. (1983) Evaluation of 20 workload measures using a psychomotor task in a moving-base aircraft simulator. Human Factors, 25, 1–16.
16.
YehY. Y.WickensC. D. (1984) An investigation of the dissociation between subjective measures of mental workload and performance. Technical report, Engineering Psychology Research Laboratory, University of Illinois.
