Abstract
Workmen's Compensation costs have become a major financial burden on industry. A significant part of these costs are the result of musculoskeletal injuries. One method of controlling these injuries is matching employees to jobs based on strength. Isometric strength testing has been shown to be an effective method of matching employee strength capability to job strength requirements. The use of screening test raises the question of test-retest consistency. This study was designed to determine the consistency of isometric strength test results over time. Thirteen student volunteer subjects (10m, 3F) participated in a testing protocol consisting of five strength tests performed a minimum of two times each at two week intervals. Four test sessions were held. An analysis of variance was used to identify week to week strength differences in the test population. Each of the five tests was analyzed separately and no significant week to week strength differences were found. This result further supports the validity of using isometric strength testing as a selection tool.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
