Team functions were used to define the concept of “teamwork” within small military units and to describe process changes in mission execution as teams trained for competition. As teams became more proficient, their functional profiles changed to reflect better distribution of member and equipment resources, and the behaviors used to cue the functions shifted to more implicit team member interactions as opposed to interactions guided by verbal and nonverbal directives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HallE. R.RizzoW. A.An assessment of US Navy tactical team training (TAEG Report No. 18). Orlando, Florida: Training Analysis and Evaluation Group, 1975. (DTIC No. AD A011 452).
2.
KlausD. J.GlaserR.Increasing team proficiency through training. 8. Final report (AIR-E1-6/68-FR). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: American Institutes for Research, 1968. (DTIC No. AD 669 688).
3.
McGrathJ. E.KravitzD. A.Group research. In RosenzweigM. R.PorterL. W. (Eds.) Annual review of psychology. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, 1982.
4.
NievaV. F.FleishmanE. A.RieckA.Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships.Washington, D. C.: Advanced Research Resources Organization, 1978.
5.
ShiflettS.EisnerE. J.PriceS. J.The definition and measurement of team functions.Bethesda, Maryland: Advanced Research Resources Organization, 1982.