A 3×3×3 factorial design, N=135, is used to evaluate the effects of three conditions of feedback (zero, low extrinsic, and high extrinsic), three conditions of response pattern restriction (no restriction dictated, restriction to three patterns, restriction to one pattern), and three levels of repetitive-figure manipulation diversity determined by scores on Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Form A, Activity III: repetitive parallel lines. The experimental task was to turn nine circularly arranged knobs repetitively in a white visual, broadband audio environment over three 6-minute periods separated by rest pauses.
O'Brien (1976) found significant differences for measures of response variability including pattern changing activity, pattern shifting, error factors, and other measures. An extended ad hoc analysis of that exploratory study is accomplished in which a comparison of percent common patterns emitted evidences that Ss who score differently on the pretest perform with different degrees of uniqueness when they are restricted to repetition of previous patterns, but not when they are free to vary types of patterns emitted. Also, comparison of initial trials indicates that high pretest scorers are more likely to begin the task with rarer patterns, low scorers use more common patterns, and intermediate scorers fall in between.
AdamsJ. A.BoulterL. R.Spatial and temporal uncertainty as determinants of vigilance behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 67, 127–31.
3.
AdamsJ. A.StensonH. H.HumesJ. M.Monitoring of complex displays - II. Effects of visual load and response complexity on human vigilance. Human Factors, 1961, 213–221.
4.
AlluisiE. A.Lectures in human performance, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va. and personal communications, March, 1974.
5.
BakanP.Discrimination decrement as a function of time in a prolonged vigil. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955, 50, 387–390.
6.
BakanP.BeltonJ. A.TothJ. C.Extraversion-introversion and decrement in an auditory vigilance task. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963, 22 ff.
7.
BakerC. H.Further toward a theory of vigilance. In BucknerMcGrath (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
8.
BroadbentD. E.Noise, paced performance, and vigilance tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 1953, 44, 428–33.
9.
BroadbentD. E.Perception and communication. London: Pergamon, 1958.
10.
BucknerD. N.An individual-difference approach to explaining vigilance performance. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963, 171 ff.
11.
ChinnMcC. R.AlluisiE. A.Effect of three kinds of knowledge of results on three measures of vigilance performance. Perceptual Motor Skills, 1964, 18, 901–12.
12.
ChristensenJ. M.Individuals and Us. Human Factors, 1966, 8, 1–6.
13.
DeCeccoJ. P.The psychology of learning and instruction: Educational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
14.
DeeseJ.OrmondE.Studies of detectability during continuous search. USAF Wright Air Development Center Technical Report 53-8, September, 1953. Cited by AdamsJ.. Monitoring of complex visual displays - II, Human Factors, 1961, Dec. 213–221.
15.
DeGreeneK. B.Systems psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
16.
EasonR.BeardshallA.JaffeeS.Performance and physiological indicants of activation in a vigilance situation. Perceptual Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 3–13.
17.
EysenckH. J. (Ed.). Experiments with drugs. New York: Macmillan, 1963.
GibsonJ. J.The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1966.
20.
GuilfordJ. P.Factorial angles to psychology. Psychological Review, 1961, 21, 20–26.
21.
GuilfordJ. P.Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1967, 1. In ParnesS. J., Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Scribner's, 1967, 268–271.
22.
HartmanB. O.StormW. F.VanderveenJ. E.VanderveenE.HaleH.BollingerR. R.Operational aspects of variations in alertness (No. 189). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) NATO, August, 1974.
23.
HatfieldJ. L.LoebM.Sense mode and coupling in a vigilance task. Perception and Psychophysics, 1968, 4, 29–36.
24.
HowellW. C.GoldsteinI. L.Engineering psychology: Current perspectives in research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
25.
JenkinsH. M.The effect of signal rate on performance in visual monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 1958, 71, 647–61.
26.
KahnemanD.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
27.
LuceT. S.Vigilance as a function of stimulus variety and response complexity. Human Factors, 1964, 2, 101–110.
28.
MacKinnonD. W.The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, July, 1962, 484–94.
29.
MackworthJ. F.Vigilance and habituation. Baltimore: Penguin, 1969.
30.
MackworthJ. F.Vigilance and attention. Baltimore: Penguin, 1970.
31.
MackworthH. H.Researches in the measurement of human performance. M. R. C. Special report 268, H. M. S. O. 1950. In SinaikoH. (Ed.), Selected papers on human performance in the design and use of control systems. New York: Dover Publications, 1961, 174–331.
32.
MaltzmanI.Thinking: From a behaviorist's point of view. Psychological Review, 1955, 62, 275–86.
33.
McFarlandR. A.HolwayA. N.HurvichL. M.Studies of visual fatigue. Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 1942. Cited by AdamsJ.Monitoring of complex visual displays - II. Human Factors, 1961, 213–221.
34.
McGrathJ. J.Cross-validation of some correlates of vigilance performance. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963, 118–123. (a).
35.
McGrathJ. J.Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963, 3–19. (b).
36.
MorganC. T.IIICookJ. S.ChapanisA.LundM. W. (Eds.). Human engineering guide to equipment design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
37.
NeisserU.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
38.
O'BrienJ. P. B.Student development services. In ThomasC.RiegleC. (Eds.), Tidewater Community College Institutional Self-Study, 1974, Chapter VII.
39.
O'BrienJ. P. B.Generation and alternation of perceptual-motor patterns as a function of creativity in a monotonous task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C.1976.
40.
ParnesS. J.Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Schribner's, 1967.
41.
PosnerM.Cognition: An introduction. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1973.
42.
StelmachG. E.Individual differences and intra-individual variability in motor performance under continuous-practice conditions. Human Factors, 1969, 11 (3), 201–206.
43.
SternR. M.Performance and physiological arousal during two vigilance tasks varying in signal presentation rate. Perceptual Motor Skills, 1966, 15, 105–14.
44.
TarrièreC.WisnerA.Effets des bruits significatifs et non-significatifs au cours d'une épreuve de vigilance. Le Travail Humain, Vol. 1–2, pp. 1–28. Cited by MackworthJ. F., Vigilance and habituation. Baltimore: Penguin, 1969, p. 152.
45.
TaylorF. V.Psychology and the design of machines. American Psychologist, 1957, 12, 249–258.
WilkinsonR. T.Interaction of noise with knowledge of results and sleep deprivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 332–37.
48.
WoodsonW. E.ConoverD. W.Human engineering guide for equipment designers. Berkeley: U. of Calif. Press, 2nd ed.1964.
49.
ZimbardoP. G.The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In ArnoldW.LevineD. (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: U. of Nebraska Press, 1969, pp. 237–307.
50.
ZimbardoP. G.RuchF. L.Psychology and life. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1975, 9th ed.
51.
ZuercherJ. D.The effects of extraneous stimulation on vigilance. Human Factors, 1965, 7, 101–105.
