This report reviews about a dozen past and current research efforts employing Monte Carlo “computerized accommodated percentage evaluation” (CAPE) models. The CAPE class of models estimate the effects of imposed limits of the accommodated proportion of a population. Most extensively use in studies of aircraft cockpit and related workplace design, the model has been applied to other areas as well. Four validation studies, five completed application investigations, and three on-going application efforts are described. Prospects for future applications are also briefly discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonT.W.Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Los Angeles: Wiley, 1958.
2.
AyoubM.M.Improved Standards for Console and Seat Design: An Unsolicited Proposal. Lubbock Tex.: Texas Tech University, 18 March 1975.
3.
BarnetteW.L.Jr., (Ed.) Readings in Psychological Tests and Measurements. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1964.
4.
BittnerA.C.Jr.Reduction in Potential User Population as the Result of Imposed Anthropometric Limits: Monte Carlo Estimation. Point Mugu Calif.: Naval Missile Center, 1974 (TP-74-6).
5.
BittnerA.C.Jr.MorrisseyS.J.MoroneyW.F.Demonstration of an Approach to Evaluate Cockpit/Aircrew Compatibility: Advanced Harrier (AV-16A) Analysis. Point Mugu, Calif,: Pacific Missile Test Center, 1975 (TP-75-31).
6.
BittnerA.C.Jr.DannhausD.M.RothJ.T.Workplace Accommodated Percentage Evaluation: Model and Preliminary Results. Point Mugu, Calif. Pacific Missile Test Center, 1976 (TP-76-1c).
7.
BittnerA.C.Jr.HalcombC.G.Validation Studies of a Computerized Accommodated Percentage Evaluation (CAPE) Model. Point Mugu, Calif,: Pacific Missile Test Center, 1976 (TP-76-2).
8.
BittnerA.C.Jr.Computerized Accommodated Percentage Evaluation (CAPE) Model for Cockpit and Other Exclusion Studies. Point Mugu, Calif.: Pacific Missile Test Center, 1975 (TP-75-49/TIP-03).
9.
BittnerA.C.Jr.MoroneyW.F.“The Accommodated Proportion of a Potential User Population: Compilation and Comparisons of Methods for Estimation”, Proc. Human Factors Society74, 15 October, 1974.
10.
BoultonC.B.An Anthropometric Survey of 2000 Royal Air Force Aircrew, 1970/1971. Farnbourough Hants, England, RAE, 1973 (TR-73083).
11.
ChenH.H.RenshawK. Personal Communication. Boeing Co. Seattle, Washington, January, 1976.
12.
ChenEdwardsH.H. R.RenshawK.Crew Station Assessment of Reach (CAR) Model Programmers Guide. Seattle, Wash.: Boeing Co. ca. March 1976a (D180-19320-1).
13.
ChenEdwardsH.H. R.RenshawK.Crew Station Assessment of Reach (CAR) Model Users Documentation. Seattle, Wash.: Boeing Co. ca. March 1976b (D180-19321-1).
14.
ClauserC.Anthropometry of Air Force Women, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1972.
15.
DanielsG.S.“The Average Man?”, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio: Wright Air Development Center, 1952 (Tech. Note WCRD 53–7).
16.
DeivanayaganS. Personal Communication, Texas Tech University, January 1976.
17.
Department of DefenceAircrew Station Geometry for Military Aircraft, MIL-STD-1333. Washington, D.C. DoD, 2 June, 1969.
18.
Department of DefenceHuman Engineering Design Criteria for Military Systems, Equipment, and Facilities, MIL-STD-1472B, Washington, D.C. DoD, 31 December 1974.
19.
GiffordProvostE.C. J.R.LazoJ.. Anthropometry of Naval Aviators-1964. Philadelphia; U.S. Naval Air Engineering Center, Aerospace Crew Equip. Lab. 1965 (NAEC-ACEL-533).
20.
GraceG.F.“Changing roles of women in the military”, Human Factors Bulletin, 18(9), 1975, pp 9–10.
21.
HertzbergDanielsH.T.E. G.S.ChurchillE.Anthropometry of Flying Personal-1950. Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio: Wright Air Development Center, 1954 (WADC TR 52–321).
22.
HertzbergH.T.E.“Engineering anthropology” in Van CottH.P.KinkadeR.G. (Eds.) Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design (rev. ed.) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 pp 467–584.
23.
KennedyK.W.Reach Capacity of the USAF PopulationWright Patterson AFB, Ohio: Aerospace Medical Research Lab. 1964 (AMRL-TDR-64-59).
24.
KetchamM.A.BittnerA.C.Jr.Anthropometric Accommodation of a Female Population in a Workplace Designed to Male Standards. Point Mugu, Calif.: Pacific Missile Test Center, 1976 (TP-76-3).
25.
LaneN.“Female Anthropometry and Cockpit Geometric” paper presented at American Psychological Assocation 82nd Annual Meeting, August, 1974.
26.
LaubachL.L.AlexanderM.“Arm reach compatibility of USAF pilots as affected by personal protective equipment”, Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, April 1975, pp 377–386.
27.
MorrisseyS.J.BittnerA.C.Jr.HalcombC.G.Study of the Applicability of a Computerized Accommodated Percentage Evaluation (CAPE) Model to Clothing Variables. Lubbock, Tex: Texas Tech University, unpublished manuscript, 9 February 1976.
28.
MoroneyW.F.Selected Bivariate Anthropometric Distributions Describing a Sample of Naval Aviators-1964. Pensacola, Fla.: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1971 (NAMRL-1130).
29.
MoroneyW.F.SmithM.J.Empirical Reduction in Potential User Population as the Result of Improved Multivariate Anthropometric Limits. Pensacola, Fla.: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1972 (NAMRL-1164).
30.
RAE (Royal Aircraft Establishment), Comments on Advanced Harrier Aircraft Configuration Definition-Cockpit. Farnsborough Hants, England, 1974 (Memo YSH/118/013 of 28 January 1974).
31.
RoebuckJ.A.Jr.KroemerK.H.E.ThomsonW.G.Engineering Anthropometry Methods. New York: Wiley, 1975.
32.
RichardsonW.“High Acceleration Cockpit Research at Northrop”, presented at 92nd Meeting of the Aircrew Station Standardization Panel, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio 30–31 July 1975.
33.
RyanP.W.Cockpit Geometry Evaluation Phase II Final Report: Vol II Human Data. Seattle, Wash.: Boeing Co.1970 (D162-10126-2).
34.
SmithMoroneyM.J. W.F.BittnerA.C.Jr.Bivariate Normal Frequency Distributions, Part I: Tables of Percent Excluded in Restricting Either or Both Variate Distributions and Procedures for Applied Use. Pensacola, Fla.: Naval Aerospace Medical Reserach Laboratory (NAMRL-1166, in press).
35.
SmithM.J.MoroneyW.F., Bivariate Normal Frequency Distribution, Part II: Figures of Percentages by Cells. Pensacola, Fla,: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1972 (NAMRL-1167).
36.
ThordsenKroemerM.L. K.H.E.LaubachL.L.Human Force Exertions in Aircraft Control Locations. Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio: Nava Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1972.
37.
ThorndikeR.L.Personnel Selection: Test and Measurement Technique. New York: Wiley, 1949.
