Information on healthcare providers on the internet can be found in both public reports and/or anecdotal comments. Healthcare consumers rely more on the anecdotal comments than public reports as they are easier to understand, more engaging and convincing. However, the anecdotal comments can be misleading as they are based on a relatively smaller and less representative sample. Hence, it’s important to understand how users make sense of the anecdotal information and define the factors that influence their decisions. This study utilized the domain of dentistry, focusing on how the nature of the review and other decision aids affect the sensemaking process of healthcare seekers. We conducted a mixed-method study with twenty participants, finding the nature of the review (the text) to be the most influential factor and the wait time to be the least contributing factor in the decision.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnisarmanS.PonathilA.LopesS.Chalil MadathilK. (2018). An in-vestigation of consumer’s choice of a healthcare facility when user-gen-erated anecdotal information is integrated into healthcare public reports. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 66, 206–220.
2.
ByhamM.MadathilK. C. (2015, September). Developing Consumer-Centered Healthcare Public Reports: Understanding the Healthcare Consumers’ Decision Making Process. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1501-1505). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
3.
FaberM.BoschM.WollersheimH.LeathermanS.GrolR. (2009). Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Medical Care, 47(1), 1–8.
4.
FinucaneM. L.AlhakamiA.SlovicP.JohnsonS. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making; Chichester, 13(1), 1.
5.
HibbardJ. H.PetersE. (2003). Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 413–433.
6.
HuppertzJ. W.CarlsonJ. P. (2010). Consumers’ use of HCAHPS ratings and word-of-mouth in hospital choice. Health Services Research, 45(6 Pt 1), 1602–1613.
7.
KolstadJ. T.ChernewM. E. (2009). Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services. Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR, 66(1 Suppl), 28S–52S.
8.
LaguT.HannonN. S.RothbergM. B.LindenauerP. K. (2010). Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(9), 942–946.
9.
LópezA.DetzA.RatanawongsaN.SarkarU. (2012). What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(6), 685–692.
10.
MadathilK. C.GreensteinJ. S. (2018). An investigation of the effect of anecdotal information on the choice of a healthcare facility. Applied Ergonomics, 70, 269-278.
11.
MarshallM.McLoughlinV. (2010). How do patients use information on health providers?BMJ : British Medical Journal (Online); London, 341. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5272
12.
MarshallM. N.ShekelleP. G.LeathermanS.BrookR. H. (2000). The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(14), 1866–1874.
13.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E.BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71(2001), 2001.
14.
PonathilA.AgnisarmanS.KhasawnehA.NarasimhaS.MadathilK. C. (2017b). An Empirical Study Investigating the Effectiveness of Decision Aids in Supporting the Sensemaking Process on Anonymous Social Media. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Meeting, 61(1), 798–802.
15.
ScharettE.MadathilK. C.LopesS.RogersH.AgnisarmanS.Nara-simhaS.. . . DyeC. (2017). An Investigation of the Information Sought by Caregivers of Alzheimer's Patients on Online Peer Support Groups. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(10), 640-657.
16.
SickB.AbrahamJ. M. (2011). Seek and ye shall find: consumer search for objective health care cost and quality information. American Journal of Medical Quality: The Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 26(6), 433–440.
17.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105.
