How Immersion,Presence,Emotion,& Workload Differ in Virtual Reality and Traditional Game Mediums

Abstract

The gaming experience is a critical component in the development and evolution of games. This study aims to assess the differences between virtual reality and a more traditional gaming experience in levels of emotion, immersion, and presence. We know that virtual reality is changing the way that people play games, but the extent to which virtual reality creates a more immersive and more present environment is still largely debated. Most of us can feel a difference but where does it lie? Similarly, if we are indeed more immersed and present, does that impact our perceived workload and how we feel about the task? These questions are examined in more detail in this paper. Results of this study may help give statistical support to various factors that are related to the virtual reality experience. These findings may extrapolate to a larger context for training simulations for military applications as well as consumer domains.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alshaer

Regenbrecht

O’Hare

. (2017). Immersion factors affecting perception and behavior in a virtual reality power wheelchair simulator. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 1-12.

Blasko-Drabik

Blasko

Fanning

Klanica

Benlamhidi

. (2011). Using computer games for learning: Designing a serious game measure. Proceedings of the 2011 APS conference in Washington D.C.

Brown

Cairns

. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. In Proceedings of CHI 2004, 1297-1300.

Chirico

Yaden

D. B.

Riva

Gaggioli

. (2016). The potential of virtual reality for the investigation of awe. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1766.

Csikszentmihalyi

. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

Donnellan

M. B.

Oswald

F. L.

Baird

B. M.

Lucas

R. E

. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E

. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology, 52, 139-183.

Kozlov

M. D.

Johansen

M. K

. (2010). Real behavior in virtual environments: Psychology experiments in a simple virtual-reality paradigm using video games. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 13(6), 711-714.

Mann

B. L

. (2008). The evolution of multimedia sound. Computers & Education, 50, 1157–1173.

10.

Mennecke

Roche

Bray

Konsynski

Lester

Rowe

Townsend

. (2007). Second Life and other virtual worlds: A roadmap for research.

11.

Sun

Zhu

Hsiao

. (2015). The effect of user’s perceived presence and promotion focus on usability for interacting in virtual environments. Applied Ergonomics, 50, 126-132.

12.

Taylor

L. N

. (2002). Video games: Perspective, point-of-view, and immersion (Master’s Thesis, University of Florida). Retrieved from http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE1000166

13.

Witmer

B.G.

Singer

M.J

. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240. Revised factor structure:

14.

Wickens

C.D.

, J.G. Hollands Engineering psychology and human performance (third ed.), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2000)