Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A recent thread of usability research is the investigation of the relationship between a product’s degree of usability and its degree of beauty. Previous research endeavors have found support for both “what is beautiful is usable” and “what is usable is beautiful” claims, emphasizing the need for further study on the topic. The current study was performed to further investigate this relationship by manipulating usability indirectly – by use of a functional prime, and by experimentally manipulating aesthetic principles. One hundred twenty-two participants rated sixteen manipulated on four aesthetic principles: symmetry, composition, curvature, and prototypicality after being presented with one of two functional primes. Results indicate that the aesthetic principles of symmetry and composition are independent primed function whereas curvature was dependent on priming.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bar

Neta

(2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological science, 17(8), 645-648.

Garner

W. R.

Clement

D. E.

(1963). Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(5), 446-452.

Grammer

Thornhill

(1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of comparative psychology, 108(3), 233.

Hassenzahl

(2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), 319-349.

Jacobsen

Höfel

(2002). Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments. Perceptual and motor skills, 95(3), 755-766.

Kent

T. M.

Carswell

C. M.

Lee

Sublette

(2017). Do Aesthetic Design Principles Predict Visual Appeal of a Simple Control Panel? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

Konkle

Oliva

(2011). Canonical visual size for real-world objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 23.

Kurosu

Kashimura

(1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. Paper presented at the Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems.

Linsen

Leyssen

M. H.

Sammartino

Palmer

S. E.

(2011). Aesthetic preferences in the size of images of real-world objects. Perception, 40(3), 291-298.

10.

Mahlke

(2007). Aesthetic and symbolic qualities as antecedents of overall judgements of interactive products People and computers XX—Engage (pp. 57-64): Springer.

11.

Palmer

S. E.

Schloss

K. B.

Sammartino

(2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual review of psychology, 64, 77-107.

12.

Rosch

(1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 104(3), 192.

13.

Sammartino

Palmer

S. E.

(2012). Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: Effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 865.

14.

Tractinsky

Katz

A. S.

Ikar

(2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with computers, 13(2), 127-145.

15.

Tuch

A. N.

Roth

S. P.

HornbæK

Opwis

Bargas-Avila

J. A.

(2012). Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1596-1607.

16.

Van Schaik

Ling

(2008). Modelling user experience with web sites: Usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness. Interacting with computers, 20(3), 419-432.

The Effect of Aesthetic Principles and a Functional Prime on Participant Ratings of Visual Appeal

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References