The combination of advances in cognitive neuroscience & the development of powerful, yet portable, devices are enabling real-time assessments in education. Electroencephalography (EEG) & functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) are two such neuroimaging tools being explored during instruction, with a current focus on student attention, engagement, & cognitive load. Neural synchrony has been linked with successful knowledge transfer, social interaction quality, engagement level, & shared attention. These studies, along with ergonomic considerations, are the focus of this literature review. Real-time learning assessments can optimize both teacher & student performance & satisfaction. A tailored instruction has the potential to create optimal learning experiences & more-proactively address learning difficulties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BevilacquaD.DavidescoI.WanL.OostrikM.ChalonerK.RowlandJ.DingM.PoppelD.DikkerS. (2018). Brain-to-Brain Synchrony and Learning Outcomes Vary by Student-Teacher Dynamics: Evidence from a Real-world Classroom Electroencephalography Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1-11.
2.
BlancoJ.JohnsonM.JaquessK.OhH.LoL.GentiliR.HatfieldB.Quantifying cognitive workload in simulated flight using passive, dry EEG measurements. Cognitive & Developmental Systems, IEEE Transactions on, PP(99), 1-1.
3.
California Department of Education. (2017). Average Class Size – CalEdFacts. Sacramento, California: Data Reporting Office.
DebenerS.MinowF.EmkesR.GandrasK.VosM. (2012). How about taking a low-cost, small, & wireless EEG for a walk?Psychophysiology, 49(11), 1617-1621.
6.
DikkerS.WanL.DavidescoI.KaggenL.OostrikM.McclintockJ.RowlandJ.MichalareasG.Van BavelJ.DingM.PoeppelD. (2017). Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom. Current Biology, 27(9), 1375-1380.
7.
DmochowskiJ. P.BezdekM. A.AbelsonB. P.JohnsonJ. S.SchumacherE. H.ParraL. C. (2014). Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing. Nature Communications, 5, 4567.
8.
FazliS.MehnertJ.SteinbrinkJ.CurioG.VillringerA.MüllerK.BlankertzB. (2012). Enhanced performance by a hybrid NIRS– EEG brain computer interface. Neuroimage, 59(1), 519-529.
9.
HairstonD. W.WhitakerK. W.RiesA. J.VettelJ. M.Cortney BradfordJ.KerickS. E.McDowellK. (2014). Usability of four commercially-oriented EEG systems. Journal of Neural Engineering, 11(4), 046018.
10.
HaistF.WaznyJ.ToomarianE.AdamoM. (2015). Development of brain systems for nonsymbolic numerosity and the relationship to formal math academic achievement. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 804-826.
11.
HirshfieldL.SoloveyE.GirouardA.KebingerJ.JacobR.SassaroliA.FantiniS. (2009). Brain measurement for usability testing & adaptive interfaces: An example of uncovering syntactic workload with functional near infrared spectroscopy. Presented at 2009 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2185-2194.
12.
HolperL.GoldinA. P.ShalomD. E.BattroA. M.WolfM.SigmanM. (2013). The teaching & the learning brain: A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher-student interactions in the socratic dialog. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 1-10.
13.
KoL.KomarovO.HairstonW.JungT. P.LinC. T. (2017). Sustained attention in real classroom settings: An EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11.
14.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C.Bangert-DrownsR. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1(1), 59-74.
15.
MathewsonK. E.BasakC.MaclinE. L.LowK. A.BootW. R.KramerA. F.FabianaM.GrattonG. (2012). Different slopes for different folks: Alpha & delta EEG power predict subsequent video game learning rate & improvements in cognitive control tasks. Psychophysiology, 49(12), 1558-1570.
16.
MoriguchiY.HirakiK. (2009). Neural origin of cognitive shifting in young children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(14), 6017.
17.
OkamotoN.EdaH.KurodaY.MaesakoT. (2008). Effectiveness of NIRS in educational research. Presented atWorld Automation Congress2008, 1-6.
18.
PerlmanS. B.LunaB.HeinT. C.HuppertT. J. (2014). fNIRS evidence of prefrontal regulation of frustration in early childhood. Neuroimage, 85, 326-334.
19.
PintiP.AichelburgC.LindF.PowerS.SwinglerE.MerlaA.HamiltonA.GilbertS.BurgessP.TachtsidisI. (2015). Using fiberless, wearable fNIRS to monitor brain activity in real-world cognitive tasks. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, 2015(106)
20.
PoulsenA. T.KamronnS.DmochowskiJ.ParraL. C.HansenL. K. (2017). EEG in the classroom: Synchronised neural recordings during video presentation. Scientific Reports, 7, 43916.
21.
SoloveyE.GirouardA.ChaunceyK.HirshfieldL.SassaroliA.ZhengF.FantiniS.JacobR. (2009). Using fNIRS brain sensing in realistic HCI settings: Experiments & guidelines. Presented at Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, 157-166.
22.
StopczynskiA.StahlhutC.LarsenJ. E.PetersenM. K.HansenL. K. (2014). The smartphone brain scanner: A portable real-time neuroimaging system. Plos One, 9(2), e86733.
23.
SutcherL.Carver-ThomasD.Darling-HammondL. (2018). Understaffed & Underprepared: California Districts Report Ongoing Teacher Shortages. Learning Policy Institute Research Brief, 1-12.
24.
SzafirD.MutluB. (2012). Pay attention: Designing adaptive agents that monitor & improve user engagement. Presented at 2012 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 11-20.
25.
SzafirD.MutluB. (2013). ARTFul: Adaptive review technology for flipped learning. Presented at 2013 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1001-1010.
26.
TakeuchiN.MoriT.SuzukamoY.IzumiS. (2016). Integration of teaching processes & learning assessment in the prefrontal cortex during a video game teaching-learning task. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2052.
27.
Van GervenP.W.PaasF.Van MerriënboerJ. J.SchmidtH. G. (2004). Memory load & the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology, 41(2), 167-174.
28.
VillringerA.ChanceB. (1997). Non-invasive optical spectroscopy & imaging of human brain function. Trends in Neurosciences, 20(10), 435-442.
29.
WickensC. D. (2004). In GordonS. E.LiuY. (Eds.), An introduction to human factors engineering (2nd ed. ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
30.
YasuiY. (2009). A brainwave signal measurement & data processing technique for daily life applications. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 28(3), 145.
31.
YukselB.OlesonK.HarrisonL.PeckE.AferganD.ChangR.JacobR. (2016). Learn piano with BACh: An adaptive learning interface that adjusts task difficulty based on brain state. Presented at Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5372-5384.
32.
QuaresimaV.BiscontiS.FerrariM. (2012). A brief review on the use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for language imaging studies in human newborns & adults. Brain Lang. 121, 79–89.
33.
WilliamsC. C.HeckerK. G.PagetM. K.CoderreS. P.BurakK. W.WrightB.KrigolsonO. E. (2017). The application of reward learning in the real world: Changes in the reward positivity amplitude reflect learning in a medical education context. International Journal of Psychophysiology.
34.
ZhaoH.CooperR. J. (2018). Review of recent progress toward a fiberless, whole-scalp diffuse optical tomography system. Neurophotonics, 5(1), 011012.
