AllardJ.DzwonczykR.YablokD.BlockF.McDonaldJ. (1995). Effect of automatic record keeping on vigilance and record keeping time. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 74(5), 619–626.
2.
DursoF. T.DattelA. R.BanburyS.TremblayS. (2004). SPAM: The real-time assessment of SA. In BanburyS.TremblayS. (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory and application (pp. 137–154). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
3.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN., Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
4.
KayJ.NealM. (1986). Effect of automatic blood pressure devices on vigilance of anesthesia residents. The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2(3), 148–150. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001340
5.
LoebR. G. (1995). Manual record keeping is not necessary for anesthesia vigilance. The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 11(1), 9–13. doi:10.1007/s10877-015-9819-z
6.
StolI. S.EhrenfeldJ. M.EpsteinR. H. (2014). Technology diffusion of anesthesia information management systems into academic anesthesia departments in the United States. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 118(3), 644–650. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000055.
7.
WeingerM. B.HerndonO. W.GabaD. M. (1997). The effect of electronic record keeping and transesophageal echocardiography on task distribution, workload, and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 87(1), 144–155.
8.
YablokD. O. (1990). Comparison of vigilance using automated versus handwritten records. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 73(3A), NA-NA