Occupant surveys were conducted in 4 office buildings, 2 with traditional non-tinted low-e glass (LeG) and 2 with electrochromic glass (EC). 106 employees working in these buildings volunteered to participate in the study. Results showed that subjective reports of overall ambient lighting conditions were comparable in the buildings. However, EC optimizes daylight and reduces sunlight glare, and significantly more workers sat close to the windows in the EC buildings compared to the LeG buildings. Workers in the EC office buildings reported significantly better daylight, significantly less adverse glare, and significantly fewer symptoms of computer vision syndrome than those in the LeG buildings.
BlehmC.VishnuS.KhattakA.MitraS.YeeR.W. (2005) Computer vision syndrome: A review, Survey of Opthalmology, 50(3), 253-262.
3.
CzeislerC.A.DuffyJ.F.ShanahanT.L.. (1999) Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker, Science, 284 (5423), 2177-2181.
KhowalD.GubiottiT.SmithC. (2016) Analysis of dynamic glass for patient satisfaction and energy savings improvements in a hospital environment, White Paper, View Inc. CA 95035, USA.
6.
KorpelaK.De BloomJ.KinnunenU. (2015) From restorative environments to restoration in work. Intelligent Buildings International, 7(4), 215-223.
7.
LeatherP.PyrgasM.BealeD.LawrenceC. (1998). Windows in the workplace: Sunlight, view, and occupational stress. Environment and Behavior, 30(6), 739-762.
8.
UlrichR.S. (1984) View through a windowmayinfluence recovery from surgery, Science, 224 (4647), 420-421.
9.
USGBC (2018) Better buildings are our Legacy, US Green Building Council (retrieved on 1/14/2018 from https://new.usgbc.org/leed).
