Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Defence Research and Development Canada - Atlantic has been investigating ideas and tools to aid shipboard planning teams with course of action (COA) development. Considerable previous research on operational planning suggests that the process is not well-suited to shipboard planning. In light of the shortcomings of current planning methods, the PreMortem method was investigated as a methodology to aid shipboard planning teams in developing more intuitive and creative COAs. The aim of this research was to evaluate planning teams’ acceptance, ease of use and perceived value of the PreMortem as an addition to traditional decision matrix planning methods. The results suggest that the PreMortem method adds value in the form of COA creativity over traditional planning methods. The PreMortem method is a recommended addition to the current process.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bryant

D. J.

(2007). Can we streamline operational planning? Canadian Military Journal. pp 84-88.

Bryant

D.J.

Bruyn Martin

Bandali

Rehak

Vokac

Lamoureux

(2007). Development and Evaluation of an Intuitive Operational Planning Process. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 1 (4). pp. 434-460.

Calabretta

Gemser

Wijnberg

(2016) The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A Paradox Perspective. Organization Studies. pp. 1-37

Coutts

D. Lt. Colonel

(2015). The RCAF professional and air force OPP: Operational design and planning for smaller headquarters. Royal Canadian Air Force Journal, 4 (1): pp. 43-45.

Klein

(2007). Performing a project PreMortem. Harvard Business Review. pp 18-19.

Mitchell

D.J.

Russo

J. E.

Pennington

(1989). Back to the future: temporal perspective in the explanation of events. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making. 2 (1): 25-38.

Nazareth

J. Brigadier

(2013). Creative thinking in warfare. Lancer Publishers LLC.

Patterson

Eggleston

(2017). Intuitive Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 11(1). pp. 5-22.

Peabody

(2017). Improving Planning: Quantitative evaluation of the PreMortem technique in field and laboratory settings. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr/374/.

10.

Serrat

(2012). The PreMortem Technique International Publications. Cornell University ILR School.

11.

Veinott

Klein

G.A.

Wiggins

(2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of the PreMortem technique on plan confidence. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference. Seattle, USA, May.

Intuitive Insights For Course Of Action Development

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References