As vehicle automation proliferates, the current emphasis on preventing driver distraction needs to transition to maintaining driver availability. During automated driving, vehicle operators are likely to use brought-in devices to access entertainment and information. Do these media devices need to be controlled by the vehicle in order to manage driver attention? In a driving simulation study (N=48) investigating driver performance shortly after transitions from automated to human control, we found that participants watching videos or reading on a tablet were far less likely (6% versus 27%) to exhibit behaviors indicative of drowsiness than when overseeing the automated driving system; irrespective of the pre-driving activity, post- transition driving performance after a five-second structured handoff was not impaired. There was not a significant difference in collision avoidance reaction time or minimum headway distance between supervision and media consumption conditions, irrespective of whether messages were presented on the tablet device, or only presented on the instrument panel, or whether there was a single or two-stage handoff.
DoctorowC. (2008). Little Brother (1st ed). New York: Tom Doherty Associates.
3.
EndsleyM. R.KirisE. O. (1995). The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(2), 381–394. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779064555
4.
FarmerC. M.BraitmanK. A.LundA. K. (2010). Cell Phone Use While Driving and Attributable Crash Risk. Traffic Injury Prevention, 11(5), 466–470. http://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2010.494191
5.
GoldC.DambockD.LorenzL.BenglerK. (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1938–1942. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433
6.
HancockP. A. (2013). In search of vigilance: The problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. American Psychologist, 68(2), 97–109. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0030214
7.
LeeK. J.JooY. K.NassC. (2014). Partially Intelligent Automobiles and Driving Experience at the Moment of System Transition. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3631–3634). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557370
8.
MacLeanA. W.DaviesD. R. T.ThieleK. (2003). The hazards and prevention of driving while sleepy. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 7(6), 507– 521. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1087-0792(03)90004-9
9.
MeratN.JamsonA. H.LaiF. C. H.DalyM.CarstenO. M. J. (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, Part B, 274–282. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005
10.
MkrtchyanA. A.MacbethJ. C.SoloveyE. T.RyanJ. C.CummingsM. L. (2012). Using Variable-Rate Alerting to Counter Boredom in Human Supervisory Control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1441–1445. http://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561406
11.
MokB.JohnsM.LeeK. J.IveH. P.MillerD.JuW. (2015). Timing of Unstructured Takeovers in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of Intelligent Vehicles 2015. Seoul, ROK.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, & U.S. Department of Transportation. (2012). Traffic Safety Facts 2012: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System (No. DOT HS 8 12 032). Washington, DC: Department of Transportaton. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812032.pdf
NeubauerC.MatthewsG.SaxbyD. (2014). Fatigue in the Automated Vehicle Do Games and Conversation Distract or Energize the Driver?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 2053–2057. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581432 Sacha Goedegebure. (2008). Big Buck Bunny. Netherlands: Blender Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.bigbuckbunny.org/
16.
SenaratneR.HardyD.VanderaaB.HalgamugeS. (2007). Driver Fatigue Detection by Fusing Multiple Cues In LiuD.FeiS.HouZ.ZhangH.SunC. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2007 (pp. 801–809). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-72393-6_96
17.
SheridanT. B.VerplankW. L. (1978). Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators.
18.
SmithB. W. (2014). Automated Vehicles Are Probably Legal in the United States (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2303904). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2303904
19.
SoloveyE. T.ZecM.Garcia PerezE. A.ReimerB.MehlerB. (2014). Classifying Driver Workload Using Physiological and Driving Performance Data: Two Field Studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4057–4066). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557068
20.
VerweyW. B.ZaidelD. M. (2000). Predicting drowsiness accidents from personal attributes, eye blinks and ongoing driving behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(1), 123–142. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00089-6
21.
YerkesR. M.DodsonJ. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. http://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503
