Honking Helps Overcome the Driving Too Slowly Problem in Driving Simulators

Abstract

In driving simulators, subjects sometimes drive more slowly than they would on real roads when not attending to driving. To address this problem, in two experiments, groups of 24 subjects drove through 138 intersections with green (53 %), yellow (36 %), or red lights (11 %). The speed limit was 35 mi/hr. In the second experiment, the following vehicle honked as needed.

The number of honks per subject varied from 0 to 6 for driving too slowly (less than 25 mi/hr) and 0 to 8 for delayed responses when a traffic light changed from red to green. Older drivers received 2.4 times more honks than younger drivers. Within 5 s after the following vehicle honked between intersections, the mean speed driven increased by 5 mi/hr. Similarly, with honking, the speed 5 s after the light changed increased by 8 mi/hr, both changes that lead to more realistic driving.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akamatsu

Green

P.A.

Bengler

(2013). Automotive technology and human factors research: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Vehicular Technology.

Diekmann

Jungbauer-Gans

Krassnig

Lorenz

(1996). Social status and aggression: A field study analyzed by survival analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(6), 761-768.

Doob

A. N.

Gross

A. E.

(1968). Status of frustrator as an inhibitor of horn-honking responses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 76(2), 213-218.

Green

(2005). How driving simulator data quality can be improved, Driving Simulation Conference North America 2005, Orlando, Florida.

Green

P.A.

Sullivan

J.M.

Tsimhoni

Oberhotzer

Buonorasa

M.L.

Devonshire

Schweitzer

Baragar

Sayer

J.R.

(2008). Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS): Human Factors and Driver-Vehicle Interface Summary Report (Technical Report), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

Hoehener

Green

P.A.

Del Vecchio

(2015, to appear). Stochastic hybrid models for predicting the behavior of drivers facing the yellow-light-dilemma, American Control Conference.

Lemaitre

Susini

Winsberg

McAdams

Letinturier

(2007). The sound quality of car horns: a psychoacoustical study of timbre. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 93(3), 457-468.

Lemaitre

Susini

Winsberg

McAdams

Letinturier

(2009). The sound quality of car horns: Designing new representative sounds. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 95(2), 356-372.

Lin

B.T.W.

Green

Jeong

(2015). Jerk and Throttle Entropy as Driver Responses to Traffic Signals in a Simulated Urban Setting. (Technical Report UMTRI-2015-xx), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

10.

Najm

W. G.

Smith

J. D.

Smith

D. L.

(2001). Analysis of Crossing Path Crashes (Technical Report DOT HS 809 423). Washington D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

11.

Shin

Lee

S. K.

(2014). Objective evaluation method for the perceived quality of car horns. Audio Engineering Society Convention 136. Audio Engineering Society.

12.

Society of Automotive Engineers (2007). Vehicular Traffic Sound Signaling Devices (Horns) (SAE standard J377), Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.

13.

Takada

Fukuda

Iwamiya

S. I.

(2013). Questionnaire survey on vehicle horn use and its effects on drivers and pedestrians. Acoustical Science and Technology, 34(3), 187-196.

14.

Takada

Murasato

Iwamiya

(2014). Comparisons of vehicle horn use in urban areas of Japan, Acoustical Science and Technology, 35(6), 309-317.

15.

Takada

Suzuki

Kim

K. H.

Iwamiya

S. I.

(2014, October). Survey on vehicle horn use in urban areas of Korea. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 249(4), 3843-3852.

16.

Takada

Takeno

Iwamiya

S. I.

(2010). Effects of vehicle horn acoustic properties on auditory impressions and the interpretation of reasons for horn use by other drivers. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 58(3), 259-272.