Effects of Display Location and Information Level on UAS Pilot Assessments of a Detect and Avoid System

Abstract

Minimum display requirements and performance standards for Detect and Avoid (DAA) systems are currently being developed to safely integrate Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System (NAS). The present study examines UAS pilots’ subjective assessments of four display configurations with either basic or advanced levels of information presented on a standalone or integrated display. Post-trial and post-simulation questionnaires queried pilots on their subjective ability to safely perform tasks and effectively utilize available information on each display. Responses indicated that the majority of pilots considered each display to be acceptable for a pilot-in-the-loop DAA task overall, but also revealed a strong preference for an integrated display with advanced information in the form of conflict resolution tools. Implications on the development of DAA display requirements, as well as the relation between the subjective evaluations and the objective performance data from previous studies are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

Drury

Estes

Reynolds

(2012). GDTI: A ground station display of traffic information for use in sense and avoid operations. Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st (pp. 8A2-1 – 8A2-13). Williamsburg, VA.

Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR, Part 91, Sec. 91.113 (2004).

Draper

D.H.

Pack

J.S.

Darrah

S.J.

Moulton

S.N.

(2014). Human-machine interface development for common airborne sense and avoid program. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2013). Integration of civil UAS in the NAS roadmap, first edition. FAA, Washington, D.C.

Feitshans

G. L.

Rowe

A. J.

Davis

J. E.

Holland

Berger

(2008). Vigilant spirit control station (VSCS)—‘The face of COUNTER’. In Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf. Exhibition, Honolulu, HI. AIAA Paper (No. 2008-6309).

Fern

Rorie

R.C.

Pack

Shively

R.J.

Draper

(2015). An evaluation of Detect and Avoid (DAA) Displays for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: The Effect on Information Level and Display Location on Pilot Performance. InProceedings of the 15th Annual AIAA Aviation, Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Dallas, TX.

Friedman-Berg

Rein

Racine

(2014). Minimum visual information requirements for detect and avoid in unmanned aircraft systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Johnson

W.W.

Battiste

Bochow

S.H.

(1999). A cockpit display designed to enable limited flight deck separation responsibility. In Proceedings of the 1999 World Aviation Conference (1999-01-5567). Anaheim, CA.

Rorie

R.C.

Fern

(2015). The impact of integrated maneuver guidance information on UAS pilots performing the detect and avoid task. In Proceedings of the 59th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.

10.

RTCA. (2013). Terms of reference RTCA special committee 228 minimum performance standards for unmanned aircraft systems, paper No. 109-13/PMC-1089. RTCA Inc., Washington, DC.

11.

RTCA, Inc. Special Committee 228 (2013). “Detect and avoid (DAA) Whitepaper,” RTCA-SC228-WG1-WP01-01

12.

Santiago

Abramson

Refai

Mueller

Johnson

Snow

(2015). “Java architecture for detect and avoid (DAA) modeling and extensibility (JADEM),” NASA/TM-2015-TBD, unpublished.

13.

Santiago

Mueller

E.R.

(2015). “Pilot Evaluation of a UAS Detect-and-Avoid System’s Effectiveness in Remaining Well Clear,” 11th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, Lisbon, Portugal.