EMG provides an earlier glimpse into the effects of cognitive distraction on brake motor response

Abstract

A driver’s ability to quickly perceive and respond to hazards is critical for traffic safety. With limited cognitive resources, any added distractions are likely to increase response times. This study analyzed the effect of two cognitive distraction tasks, 1-back and countdown, on total brake-response time and its subcomponents: perception and leg movement times (n=6). Participants sat in a stationary vehicle and responded to a light stimulus by moving their foot from the accelerator to the brake pedal as quickly as possible. Electromyography (EMG) recordings of the lower leg muscle provided earlier detection of movement onset compared to accelerator pedal motion. Performing a cognitive task was found to increase perception and total brake-response time compared to the baseline condition. There were no significant differences observed in leg movement time while performing either of the distraction tasks versus the baseline. Implications for areas of improvement and future works are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bellinger

Budde

Machida

Richardson

Berg

(2009). The effect of cellular telephone conversation and music listening on response time in braking. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6), 441–451.

Botwinick

Thompson

(1966). Premotor and motor components of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 9–15.

Broen

N. L.

Chiang

D. P.

(1996). Braking response times for 100 drivers in the avoidance of an unexpected obstacle as measured in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40, 900–904.

Caird

Willness

Steel

Scialfa

(2008). A metaanalysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(4), 1282–1293.

Cavanagh

P. R.

Komi

P. V.

(1979). Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 42(3), 159–163.

Consiglio

Driscoll

Witte

Berg

(2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 495–500.

Corcos

D. M.

Gottlieb

G. L.

Latash

M. L.

Almeida

G. L.

Agarwal

G. C.

(1992). Electromechanical delay: An experimental artifact. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology: Official Journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2(2), 59–68.

D’Addario

(2014). Perception-response time to emergency roadway hazards and the effect of cognitive distraction (Master of Applied Science). University of Toronto.

Fitch

Blanco

Morgan

Wharton

(2010). Driver braking performance to surprise and expected events. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54, 2075–2080.

10.

Lee

McGehee

Brown

Reyes

(2002). Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44(2), 314–334.

11.

Luschei

Saslow

Glickstein

(1967). Muscle potentials in reaction time. Experimental Neurology, 18(4), 429–442.

12.

Marques

Barreiros

Cabri

Carita

Friesecke

Loehr

(2008). Does the brake response time of the right leg change after left total knee arthroplasty? A prospective study. The Knee, 15(4), 295–298.

13.

Mehler

Reimer

Coughlin

Dusek

(2009). Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2138, 6–12.

14.

Olson

(1989). Driver perception response time (890731). Presented at the Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.

15.

Olson

Sivak

(1986). Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards. Human Factors, 28(1), 91– 96.

16.

Seto

Minegishi

Yang

Kobayashi

(2004). Research on detection of braking reactions in emergency situations. Vehicle System Dynamics, 41, 784–790.

17.

Spehar

Kolesarić

(2010). The effects of stimulus context on components of simple reaction time. Review of Psychology, 17(1), 59–67.