Texting while driving has been researched from numerous disciplines including psychology and safety. This current study examines texting while driving through the lens of technology studies. Rather than look at the behavior and its effect on task performance, the technology of the cell phone and its relationship with the owner is explored. While youth is often associated with texting while driving, this study found that age was not significantly different between those who text while driving and those who don’t. Using the domestication approach that was developed in technology studies, our research finds that earlier domestication of a technology (cell phone) affects the behavior of the user when they attempt to use another technology. Drivers who text while driving adopted the cell phone technology younger and often before the age of 16, the traditional age to begin driving. This research highlights the role of technology domestication in task behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakhusM. (2003). Understanding information and communication technology and infrastructure in everyday life. In KatzJ. (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 27-43). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
2.
AtchleyP.AtwoodS.BoultonA. (2011). The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: Behaviormayshape attitude. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(1), 134-142. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.003
3.
AtchleyP.HadlockC.LaneS. (2012). Stuck in the 70s: The role of social norms in distracted driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 279-284.
4.
AuneM. (1996). The computer in everyday life Patterns of domestication of a new technology. In LieM.SorensenK. (Eds), Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. (pp. 91-120). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
5.
BayerJ.CampbellS. (2012). Texting while driving on automatic: Considering the frequency-independent side of habit. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2083-2090.
6.
BeckerT.HartmannM.PunieY.WardK. (Eds.). (2006). Domestication of Media and Technology. New York, NY: Open University Press.
HaddonL. (2011). Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian Journal of Communication, 36, 311-323.
9.
HaddonL. (2007). Roger Silverstone’s legacies: domestication. New Media Society, 9 (1), 25-32.
10.
HaddonL. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society, 22, 195-203.
11.
HaddonL. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In KatzJ. (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 43-56). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
12.
HaddonL. (1991). Researching gender and home computers. In SorensenK.BergA. (Eds.). Technology and everyday life. Trajectories and transformations. Report No 5. Oslo: NAVF-NTNF-NORAS.
13.
HaddonL.SilverstoneR. (1996). Information and communication technologies and the young elderly (SPRU/CICT Report Series, no. 13). Brighton: University of Sussex.
14.
HaddonL.SilverstoneR. (1995). Lone parents and their information and communication technologies (SPRU/CICT Report Series, no. 12). Brighton: University of Sussex.
15.
HarrisonM., (2011) College students’ prevalence and perceptions of text messaging while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1516-1520.
16.
HorreyW.LeschM. (2009). Driver-initiated distractions: Examining strategic adaption for in-vehicle task initiation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 115-122.
17.
KatzJ. (2003). Do machines become us? In KatzJ. (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 15-26). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
18.
KimByoungsoo. (2012). The diffusion of mobile data services and applications: Exploring the role of habit and its antecedents. Telecommunications Policy, 36, 69-81.
LicoppeC., (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone; From the domestic to the mobile phone. In KatzJ. (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 171-186). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
21.
LieM.SorensenK. (Eds.). (1996). Making Technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
22.
OksmanV.RautiainenP. (2003). Perhaps it is a body part: How the mobile phone became an organic part of the everyday lives of Finnish children and teenagers. In KatzJ. (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 293-308). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
23.
PoystiL.RajalinS.SummalaH. (2005). Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 47-51.
24.
SchomigN.MetzB. (2013). Three levels of situation awareness in driving with secondary tasks. Safety Science, 56, 44-51.
25.
SchroederP.MeyersM.KostyniukL. (2013, April). National survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors – 2012. (Report No. DOT HS 811 729). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
26.
SelwynN. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: the role of sociology theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38 (1), 81-96.
27.
SheridanT.B. (2004). Driver Distraction from a Control Theory Perspective. Human Factors, 46(4), 587-598.
28.
SilverstoneR.HaddonL. (1996) Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies, eds. SilverstoneR.MansellR., 44-74, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
SkierkowskiD.WoodR. (2012). To text or not to text? The importance of text messaging among college-aged youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 744-756.
30.
SorensenK.SorgaardJ. (1994). Mobility and modernity. Towards a sociology of cars. In SorensenK. (Ed.), The Car and it environments: The past, present and future of the motorcar in Norway. Brussels: EC, COST Social Sciences.
31.
StuttsJ.FeaganesJ.ReinfurtD.RodgmanE.HamlettC.GishK.StaplinL. (2005). Driver’s exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 1093-1101.
32.
TsengC.ChangH.WooT. (2013). Modeling motivation and habit in driving behavior under lifetime driver’s license revocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 51, 260-267.
33.
U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2013. Distracted Driving 2011: Summary of Statistical Findings. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811737.pdf.
