Feedback is important for Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction designs. Since vibrotactile feedback has its own advantages such as no requirements of visual/auditory attention and robustness to surrounding noise, it is a valuable alternative to visual and auditory feedback designs. A literature review was conducted on empirical vibrotactile studies. Based on the 24 studies identified, a statistical analysis was conducted to investigate user performance across vibrotactile designs. Results indicated that using on/off vibration feedback for notification of new events resulted in the fastest responses (M = 1.1 sec.). In contrast, mapping vibrations to complex information yielded slower responses (M = 3.0 sec.) but still high accuracy (~84.8%). Moreover, no significant moderator effect of decision complexity, cue availability, decision urgency, and vibration location was found. Overall, the study findings can shed light on further vibrotactile designs for information communication. Results also provide references for measuring user performance of such designs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apple Inc. (1987). Human Interface Guidelines: The Apple Desktop Interface. Boston: MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
2.
AzenkotS.PrasainS.BorningA.FortunaE.LadnerR.WobbrockJ. (2011). Enhancing Independence and Safety for Blind and Deaf-blind Public Transit Riders. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11), 3247-3256.
3.
BialD.AltF.KernD.SchmidtA. (2011). Enhancing Outdoor Navigation Systems through Vibrotactile Feedback, Proceedings of CHI 2011, 1273 – 1278.
4.
BrownL.BrewsterS.PurchaseH. C. (2005). A First Investigation into the Effectiveness of Tactons, Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 167-176.
5.
BrownL.BrewsterS.PurchaseH. C. (2006). Multidimensional Tactons for Non-Visual Information Presentation in Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 231-238.
6.
BrownL.KaaresojaT. (2006). Feel Who’s Talking: Using Tactons for Mobile Phone Alerts. Proceeding of CHI ‘06 (Extended Abstracts) on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 604-609.
7.
ChanA.MacLeanK.McGrenereJ. (2007). Designing Haptic Icons to Support Collaborative Turn-taking, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5): 333-355.
8.
ChangW.HwangW.JiY. (2011). Haptic Seat Interfaces for Driver Information and Warning Systems. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 27(12): 1119–1132.
9.
CummingG. (2014). The New Statistics: Why and How, Psychological Science, 25: 7-29.
10.
FerrisT.HameedS.PenfoldR.RaoN. (2007). Tactons in Multitask Environments: The interaction of Presentation Modality and Processing Code. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting, 1481-1485.
11.
FerrisT. (2010).Informative Vibrotactile Displays to Support Attention and Task Management in Anesthesiology (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78911.
12.
FitchG.M.KieferR. J.HankeyJ. M.KleinerB. M. (2007). Toward Developing an Approach for Alerting Drivers to the Direction of a Crash Threat, Human Factors. 49(4): 710-720.
13.
GhianiG.LeporiniB.PaternoF. (2009). Vibrotactile Feedback to Aid Blind Users of Mobile Guides. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 20: 305-317.
14.
HoC.TanH.SpenceC. (2005). Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(6): 397–412.
15.
HogganE.BrewsterS. (2007). New Parameters for Tacton Design. Proceedings of CHI2007, 2417-2422.
16.
JaimesA.SebeN. (2007). Multimodal human-computer interaction: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 108: 116–134.
17.
JonesL.A.SarterN. (2008). Tactile Displays: Communicating Through the Skin. Human Factors, 50(1), 90-111.
18.
KarueiI.MacLeanK. E.Foley-FisherZ.MacKenzieR.KochS.EI-ZohairyM. (2011). Detecting Vibrations Across the Body in Mobile Contexts. Proceedings of the CHI’11 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3267-3276.
19.
KohliL.YanagidaY.NiwaM.LindemanR. W. (2006). Towards Effective Information Display Using Vibrotactile Apparent Motion. Proceedings of The 14th Symposium On Haptic Interfaces For Virtual Environment And Teleoperator Systems, 445-451.
20.
KrausmanA. S.WhiteT. L. (2006). Tactile Displays and Detectability of Vibrotactile Patterns as Combat Assault Maneuvers are Being Performed, Reports of U.S. Army Research Laboratory. Retrieved from http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo1958/GetTRDoc.pdf.
21.
LiH.SarterN. B.SebokA.WickensC. D. (2012). The Design and Evaluation of Visual and Tactile Warnings in Support of Space Teleoperation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, 56(1): 1331-1335.
22.
LuS. A.WickensC. D.SarterN.SebokA. (2011). Informing the Design of Multimodal Displays: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies Comparing Auditory and Tactile Interruptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, 1170-1174.
23.
MatschekoM.FerschaA.RienerA.LehnerM. (2010). Tactor Placement in Wrist Worn Wearables. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), 1-8.
24.
McDanielT.KrishnaS.ColbryD.PanchanathanS. (2009). Using Tactile Rhythm to Convey Interpersonal Distances to Individuals who are Blind. Proceedings of CHI2009, 4669 – 4674.
25.
McDanielT.GoldbergM.VillanuevaD.ViswanathanL. N. (2011). Motor Learning Using a Kinematic-Vibrotactile Mapping Targeting Fundamental Movements, Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 543-552.
26.
NgJ.ManJ.C.FelsS.DumontG.AnserminoJ. M. (2005). An Evaluation of a Vibro-tactile Display Prototye for Physiological Monitoring. Display Settings. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 101(6):1719-24.
27.
OakleyI.KimY.LeeJ.RyuJ. (2006). Determining the Feasibility of Forearm Mounted Vibrotactile Displays. Proceedings of the Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 27 – 34.
28.
Pérez-QuiñonesM.SibertJ. (1996). A Collaborative Model of Feedback in Human-Computer Interaction, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 316-323.
29.
PoupyrevI.MaruyamaS. (2003). Tactile Interfaces for Small Touch Screens, Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 217 – 220.
30.
RoadyT.FerrisT. K. (2012). An Analysis of Static, Dynamic, and Saltatory Vibrotactile Stimuli to Inform the Design of Efficient Haptic Communication Systems, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1): 2075-2079.
31.
SalzerY.Oron-GiladT. O.RonenAParmetY.(2011). Vibrotactile “on-thigh” Alerting System in the Cockpit. Human Factors, 53(2):118-31.
32.
SalzerY.Oron-GiladT. O. (2012). A Comparison of “On-Thigh” Vibrotactile, Combined Visual-Vibrotactile, and Visual-Only Alerting Systems for The Cockpit Under Visually Demanding Conditions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, 1644 – 1648.
33.
SellenA.KurtenbachG.BuxtonW. (1992). The Prevention of Mode Errors Through Sensory Feedback, Human Computer Interaction, 7(2): 141-164.
34.
ShneidermanB. (1982). The Future of Interactive Systems and the Emergence of Direct Manipulation. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1: 237-256.
35.
SklarA. E.SarterN. B. (1999). Good Vibrations: Tactile Feedback in Support of Attention Allocation and Human-Automation Coordination in Event-Driven Domains. Human Factors, 41(4): 543-552.
36.
TerrenceP. I.BrillJ. C.GilsonR. D. (2005). Body Orientation and the Perception of Spatial Auditory and Tactile Cues, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 1663-1667.
