Abstract
The present study aims to clarify how four different combinations of input and output resources affect driving performance, because usage of information devices based on non-visual and non-manual interface during driving is configured as distracter recently. The primary task consisted of following a lead vehicle at a constant headway while that vehicle changed speed according to a predefined rhythm. The secondary task, which involved using a surrogate user interface, consisted of four different tasks to assess interference with the driver’s attentional resource during driving. To achieve the objective, we conducted a field experiment on a test track using 14 participants. The results suggest that the smallest effects on driving-relevant metrics were for the combination of auditory stimuli and verbal response, and that the greatest effects were for the combination of visual stimuli and manual response.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
