AtkinsonD. J.ClarkM. H. (2013, March). Autonomous agents and human interpersonal trust: Can we engineer a human-machine social Interface for trust?. In 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series, 2-7.
2.
BarbeyA. K.SlomanS. A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(03), 241-254.
3.
BecchioC.ManeraV.SartoriL.CavalloA.CastielloU. (2012). Grasping intentions: from thought experiments to empirical evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(117), 1-6.
4.
BeerJ. S.OchsnerK. N. (2006). Social cognition: A multi level analysis. Brain Research, 1079(1), 98-105.
5.
BohlV.van den BosW. (2012). Toward an integrative account of social cognition: marrying theory of mind and interactionism to study the interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(274), 1-15.
6.
BreazealC.GrayJ.BerlinM. (2009). An embodied cognition approach to mindreading skills for socially intelligent robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 28, 656-680.
7.
Chatel-GoldmanJ.SchwartzJ. L.JuttenC.CongedoM. (2013). Non-local mind from the perspective of social cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(107).
8.
CookseyR. W. (1996). The methodology of social judgement theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 2(2-3), 141-174.
9.
DaleR.FusaroliR.DuranN.RichardsonD. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43-95.
10.
DautenhahnK. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679-704.
11.
DeStenoD.BreazealC.FrankR. H.PizarroD.BaumannJ.DickensL.LeeJ. J. (2012). Detecting the trustworthiness of novel partners in economic exchange. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1549-1556.
12.
DhamiM. K.ThomsonM. E. (2012). On the relevance of Cognitive Continuum Theory and quasirationality for understanding management judgment and decision making. European Management Journal, 30(4), 316-326.
13.
DohertyM. E.KurzE. M. (1996). Social judgement theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 2(2-3), 109-140.
14.
EvansJ. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
15.
EvansJ. S. B.StanovichK. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241.
16.
FioreS. M.WiltshireT. J.LobatoE. J. C.JentschF. G.HuangW. H.AxelrodB. (2013). Towards understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: Effects of robot gaze and proxemics behavior. Frontiers in Psychology: Cognitive Science, 4(859), 1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859
17.
FreemanJ. B.DaleR. (2013). Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 83-97.
18.
FrithC. D.FrithU. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17(16), R724-R732.
19.
HammondK. R. (1993). Naturalistic decision making from a Brunswikian viewpoint: Its past, present, future. In KleinG. A.OrasanuJ. E.CalderwoodR. E.ZsambokC. E. (Eds.) Decision making in action: Models and methods, 205-227.
20.
HammondK. R.HammR. M.GrassiaJ.PearsonT. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(5), 753-770.
21.
HardinC. D.ConleyT. D. (2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. In MoskowitzG.B. (Ed.), Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition (pp. 3-17). Psychology Press.
22.
JanssenJ. H.TackenP.de VriesJ. J. G.van den BroekE. L.WesterinkJ. H.HaselagerP.IJsselsteijnW. A. (2013). Machines outperform laypersons in recognizing emotions elicited by autobiographical recollection. Human–Computer Interaction, 28(6), 479-517.
23.
KaschakM. P.ManerJ. K. (2009). Embodiment, evolution, and social cognition: An integrative framework. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1236-1244.
24.
KleinG.HoffmanR. R.FeltovichP. J.WoodsD. D.BradshawJ. M. (2004). Ten challenges for making automation a" team player" in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(6), 91-95.
25.
LobatoE. J. C.WiltshireT. J.FioreS. M. (2013). A dual-process approach to understanding human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting, 1263-1267.
26.
LouwerseM. M.DaleR.BardE. G.JeuniauxP. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404-1426.
27.
MarshK. L.RichardsonM. J.SchmidtR. C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 320-339.
28.
NestlerS.BackM. D. (2013). Applications and Extensions of the Lens Model to Understand Interpersonal Judgments at Zero Acquaintance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 374-379.
29.
PezzuloG. (2012). The “interaction engine”: A common pragmatic competence across linguistic and nonlinguistic interactions. Autonomous Mental Development, IEEE Transactions on, 4(2), 105-123.
30.
PezzuloG.DonnarummaF.DindoH. (2013). Human sensorimotor communication: A theory of signaling in online social interactions. PLoS ONE8(11): e79876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079876
31.
PrzyrembelM.SmallwoodJ.PauenM.SingerT. (2012). Illuminating the dark matter of social neuroscience: Considering the problem of social interaction from philosophical, psychological, and neuroscientific perspectives. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(190), 1-15.
32.
RobertsR. D.ZeidnerM.MatthewsG. (2001). Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions. Emotion, 1(3), 196-231.
33.
RussoI.CaselliT. (2013, December). Changeable polarity of verbs through emotions’ attribution in crowdsourcing experiments. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Emotion and Sentiment in Social and Expressive Media
34.
SatputeA. B.LiebermanM. D. (2006). Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition. Brain Research, 1079, 86-97.
35.
SaxeR. (2006). Uniquely human social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 235-239.
36.
SeminG. R.SmithE. R. (2013). Socially situated cognition in perspective. Social Cognition, 31(2), 125-146.
37.
StandingM. (2008). Clinical judgement and decision making in nursing–nine modes of practice in a revised cognitive continuum. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 124.
38.
StanovichK. E.ToplakM. E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 3-13.
39.
TylénK.AllenM.HunterB. K.RoepstorffA. (2012). Interaction vs. observation: Distinctive modes of social cognition in human brain and behavior? A combined fMRI and eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(331), 1-11.
40.
VandeLuitgaardenG. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice in social work: Lessons from judgment and decision-making theory. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 243-260.
41.
VicenteK. J. (2003). Beyond the lens model and direct perception: Toward a broader ecological psychology. Ecological Psychology, 15(3), 241-267.
42.
VinciarelliA.PanticM.HeylenD.PelachaudC.PoggiI.D’ErricoF.SchröderM. (2012). Bridging the gap between social animal and unsocial machine: A survey of social signal processing. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions, 3(1), 69-87.
43.
WiltshireT. J.BarberD.FioreS. M. (2013a). Towards modeling social-cognitive mechanisms in robots to facilitate human-robot teaming. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting, 1278-1282.
44.
WiltshireT. J.LobatoE. J. C.JentschF. G.FioreS. M. (2013b). Will (dis)embodied LIDA agents be socially interactive?Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 4(2), 42-47. DOI: 10.2478/jagi-2013-0004.
45.
WiltshireT. J.LobatoE. J. C.WedellA.HuangW.AxelrodBFioreS. M. (2013c). Effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior on perceived social presence during a hallway navigation scenario. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting, 1273-1277.
46.
WiltshireT. J.LobatoE. J. C.VelezJ.JentschF. G.FioreS. (2014). An interdisciplinary taxonomy of social cues and signals in the service of engineering robotic social intelligence. In SPIE 9084 Unmanned Systems Technology XVI. 90840F.
47.
WiltshireT. J.SmithD. C.KeeblerJ. R. (2013d). Cybernetic Teams: Towards the Implementation of Team Heuristics in HRI. In Virtual Augmented and Mixed Reality. Designing and Developing Augmented and Virtual Environments (pp. 321-330).