With the current trend toward semi-autonomous welding systems, the typical duties of a skilled welder are likely to transition from that of manual operator to a more supervisory role. The shifting demands on welders necessitates novel welding displays to support an increased variety of tasks. The current work utilizes applied cognitive task analysis to identify the needs of expert welders, specifically in regards to the identification of important sensory cues useful when monitoring the welding process in real-time. Results are presented in a cognitive demands table in a manner intended to be useful to multidisciplinary teams engaged in the development of future welding platforms.
AgapakisJ. E.MasubuchiK.WittelsN. (1984). “General visual sensing techniques for automated welding fabrication.” Fourth international Conference on Robot vision and sensory control.
3.
CarstenO.LaiF. C. H.BarnardY.JamsonA. H.MeratN. (2012). Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving Does It Matter What Aspects Are Automated?Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 747–761. doi:10.1177/0018720812460246
4.
FuB.SeidelmanW.YangR.CarswellC.M. (In Press) Towards Virtualized Welding: Visualization and Monitoring of Remote Welding.
5.
MeratN.JamsonA. H.LaiF. C. H.CarstenO. (2012). Highly Automated Driving, Secondary Task Performance, and Driver State. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 762–771. doi:10.1177/001872081244208
6.
MeratN.LeeJ. D. (2012). Preface to the Special Section on Human Factors and Automation in Vehicles Designing Highly Automated Vehicles With the Driver in Mind. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 681–686. doi:10.1177/0018720812461374
7.
MilitelloL. G.HuttonR. J. B. (1998). Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): a practitioner’s toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics, 41(11), 1618–1641. doi:10.1080/001401398186108
8.
MosierK. L.SethiN.McCauleyS.KhooL.OrasanuJ. M. (2007). What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You: Factors Impacting Diagnosis in the Automated Cockpit. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(2), 300–310. doi:10.1518/001872007X312513
9.
ParasuramanR.MoulouaM.MolloyR. (1996). Effects of Adaptive Task Allocation on Monitoring of Automated Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38(4), 665–679. doi:10.1518/001872096778827279
10.
PattersonR.WinterbottomM. D.PierceB. J. (2006). Perceptual Issues in the Use of Head-Mounted Visual Displays. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48(3), 555–573. doi:10.1518/001872006778606877
11.
SarterN. B.MumawR. J.WickensC. D. (2007). Pilots’ Monitoring Strategies and Performance on Automated Flight Decks: An Empirical Study Combining Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Data. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(3), 347–357. doi:10.1518/001872007X196685
12.
SeidelmanW.CarswellC.M.LeeM.P.KentT.FuB.YangR. (In Press). User Centered Design of a Hybrid-Reality Display for Weld Monitoring. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14). doi:10.1145/2559206.2581261
13.
Tofel-GrehlC.FeldonD. F. (2013). Cognitive Task Analysis-Based Training: A Meta-Analysis of Studies. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 7(3), 293–304. doi:10.1177/1555343412474821
