Individual Differences in Cognitive Strategy During Reactive Task-Set Switching

Abstract

Researchers who employ traditional laboratory task-set switching paradigms often assume that their participants are using only one strategy to complete switch moves. In the current study, we hypothesized that real world task-set switching behaviors are facilitated by multiple processing strategies, including fast “heuristic” strategies that are employed when switching is routine, and slower “reasoned” strategies that are used less often when heuristic strategies fail. In this study, 151 undergraduate students from George Mason University volunteered to complete the Youmans Cognitive Flexibility Assessment (YCFA), a computer-based, reactive task-set switching paradigm that takes the form of a simple puzzle game. Participants’ reaction time data suggests that they tried to utilize both heuristic and reasoned strategies to make task-set switches, and that they only used reasoned strategies when heuristic strategies failed. The data also revealed that participants quickly abandoned reasoned strategies when heuristic strategies once again become successful. We conclude by providing some guidance for system designers regarding the speed with which humans who are employing reasoned approaches to task-set switching will abandon them once heuristic approaches again become successful, and by discussing the implications of our findings for safe system design.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

D. A.

Styles

E. A.

Hsieh

(1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Umiltà

Moscovitch

(Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cowan

(2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 51-57.

Evans

J.S.B.T.

(2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, pp. 255-278.

Fiske

S. T

Taylor

S. E.

(2008). Social Cognition: From brains to culture. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc..

Gonzalez

C. A.

Figueroa

I. J.

Bellows

B. G.

Rhodes

Youmans

R. J.

(2013). A New Behavioral Measure of Cognitive Flexibility. Proceedings From HCII ’13: 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.

James

(1890). 1950. The principles of psychology.

Jersild

A. T.

(1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of psychology.

Kiesel

Steinhauser

Wendt

Falkenstein

Jost

Philipp

A. M.

Koch

(2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological bulletin, 136(5), 849.

Kahneman

(2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58, pp. 697-720.

10.

Kahneman

(2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

11.

Monsell

Yeung

Azuma

(2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task?. Psychological research, 63(3-4), 250-264.

12.

Monsell

(2003). Task switching. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(3), 134-140.

13.

Rogers

R. D.

Monsell

(1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 124(2), 207.

14.

Rubinstein

J. S.

Meyer

D. E.

Evans

J. E.

(2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.

15.

Stanovich

K.E.

(1999) Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Youmans

R. J.

Figueroa

I. J.

Kramarova

(2011, September). Reactive task-set switching ability, not working memory capacity, predicts change blindness sensitivity. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 914-918). Sage Publications.

17.

Youmans

Ohlsson

(2005). Training produces suboptimal adaptation to redundant instrument failure in a simulated human-machine interface. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.