Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aimed to extend understanding of individual differences in over-confidence in driver safety. First, we discriminated general driving confidence from confidence in coping with impairments such as fatigue and distraction. Second, we discriminated three aspects of overconfidence specified in terms of a recent Bayesian belief updating model of over-confidence (Moore and Healy, 2008): overestimation, overplacement and overprecision. Calibration tasks were used for this purpose. Results showed that the magnitude of overconfidence differed across the various metrics, and different metrics were only modestly intercorrelated. Confidence in handling impairment appears to be distinct from general confidence. Both forms of confidence were negatively related to dislike of driving but related differently to other aspects of driver behavior and stress. Risk factors related to self-estimation (violations, thrill-seeking) may be distinct from factors related to overplacement (aggression). Discrimination of multiple metrics for driving overconfidence may support better matching of safety interventions to the individual driver.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alicke

Govorlin

(2005). The better-than-average effect. In Alicke

M. D.

Dunning

D. A.

Krueger

(Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 85–106). New York: The Psychology Press.

Dorn

Matthews

(1995). Prediction of mood and risk appraisals from trait measures: Two studies of simulated driving. European Journal of Personality, 9, 25-42.

Hansson

Juslin

Winman

(2008). The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for over-confidence in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1027-1042.

Hilton

Régner

Cabantous

Charalambides

Vautier

(2011). Do positive illusions predict over-confidence in judgment? A test using interval production and probability evaluation measures of miscalibration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 117-139.

Kruger

(1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221–232.

Lesch

M. F.

Hancock

P. A.

(2004). Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: are drivers aware of their performance decrements?. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36, 471-480.

Matthews

(2002). Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 195-211.

Matthews

M. L.

Moran

A. R.

(1986). Age differences in male drivers’ perception of accident risk: the role of perceived driving ability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 299-313.

Matthews

Tsuda

Xin

Ozeki

(1999). Individual differences in driver stress vulnerability in a Japanese sample. Ergonomics, 42, 401-415.

10.

Moore

D. A.

Healy

P. J.

(2008). The trouble with over-confidence. Psychological Review, 115, 502-517.

11.

Näätänen

Summala

(1974). A model for the role of motivational factors in driver’s decision-making. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 243-261.

12.

Reason

J.T.

Manstead

Stradling

Baxter

Campbell

(1990). Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? Ergonomics, 33, 1315–1332.

13.

Reimer

D’Ambrosio

L. A.

Gilbert

Coughlin

J. F.

Biederman

Surman

…Aleardi

(2005). Behavior differences in drivers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: The driving behavior questionnaire. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 996-1004.

14.

Schaefer

P. S.

Williams

C. C.

Goodie

A. S.

Campbell

W. K.

(2004). Over-confidence and the big five. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 473-480.

15.

Schlehofer

M. M.

Thompson

S. C.

Ting

Ostermann

Nierman

Skenderian

(2010). Psychological predictors of college students’ cell phone use while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1107-1112.

16.

Strayer

D. L.

Drews

F. A.

Johnston

W. A.

(2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-32.

17.

Summala

(1996). Accident risk and driver behaviour. Safety Science, 22, 103-117.

18.

Svenson

(1981). Are we less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47, 143–151.

19.

White

M.P.

Eiser

J.R.

Harris

P.R.

(2004). Risk perceptions of mobile phone use while driving. Risk Analysis, 24, 323–324.

Individual Differences in Driver Over-Confidence

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References