Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Medical doctors typically identify reversible causes associated with cardiac arrest by recalling them from memory, using a mnemonic. External techniques, such as cognitive aids (e.g., iPad-based applications), have been shown to produce an increase in performance in medical diagnosis. We studied two alternative approaches to the traditional method of using mnemonics to identify reversible causes of cardiac arrest. One approach displayed the causes in alphabetical order (alphabetical scheme) while the other approach displayed causes ordered by their relevance to the patient-context (context-sensitive scheme). We recorded performance and usability measures for these two approaches in two simulated cardiac arrest scenarios for each group. It took significantly longer for the participants to identify the causes using the context- sensitive scheme. However, the context-sensitive scheme resulted in significantly fewer unnecessary keystrokes. The two schemes did not differ significantly in terms of their usability ratings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bortle

(2010). The role of mnemonic acronyms in clinical emergency medicine: A grounded theory study. (Doctoral Disseration). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3431686)

Brooke

(1996). Usability Evaluation in Industry. Niagara Falls, NY: CRC Press

Devolder

Pynoo

Voet

Adang

Vercruysse

Duyck

(2009). Optimizing physicians’ instruction of PACS through e-learning: cognitive load theory applied. Journal Of Digital Imaging, 22(1), 25-33.

Dyson

Voisey

Hughes

Higgins

McQuillan

(2004). Educational psychology in medical learning: A randomised controlled trial of two aide memoires for the recall of causes of electromechanical dissociation. Emergency Medicine Journal, 21(4), 457-460.

Food and Drug Administration. (2011). Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Optimize Medical Device Design. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Grześkowiak

(2011). The knowledge of the potential reversible causes (4H, 4T) in cardiac arrest and applying them while performing a successful resuscitation–a comparative study. Science for Medical Practice, 5:(23-27).

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139-183.

Hughes

McQuillan

P. J.

(1998). Sequential recall of causes of electro- mechanical dissociation (EMD). Resuscitation, 37(1).

Jones

Lammas

Gwinnutt

(2010). Poor recall of “4Hs and 4Ts” by medical staff. Resuscitation, 81(11).

10.

Kloeck

Cummins

R. O.

Chamberlain

Bossaert

Callanan

Carli

. . .Steen

(1997). The universal advanced life support algorithm: An advisory statement from the advanced life support- working group of the international liaison committee on resuscitation. Circulation, 95(8), 2180-2182.

11.

Low

Clark

Soar

Padkin

Stoneham

Perkins

G. D.

Nolan

(2011). A randomised control trial to determine if use of the iResus© application on a smart phone improves the performance of an advanced life support provider in a simulated medical emergency. Anaesthesia, 66(4), 255-262.

12.

Neumar

R. W.

Otto

C. W.

Link

M. S.

Kronick

S. L.

Shuster

Callaway

C. W.

. . .Morrison

L. J.

(2010). Part 8: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support. Circulation, 122(18 suppl 3), S729-S767.

13.

Rosenberg

Levin

Myerberg

R.J.

(1999). A mnemonic for the recall of causes of electro-mechanical dissociation (EMD). Resuscitation, 40(1).

14.

Ulrich

Eppinger

(2012). Product design and development (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill

Using a context-sensitive ranking method to organize reversible causes of cardiac arrest in a digital cognitive aid

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References