Surgical team members are typically defined by professional roles. In many surgical teams, membership changes as staffing decisions are subject to considerations other than keeping surgical teams consistent. These considerations may include staffing patterns on the day of surgery and at the time of a surgical case. Teamwork skill training and safety culture have been emphasized, although much is known about the contribution to team performance from team consistency. We review the literature on cognitive and psychosocial benefits of consistent surgical teams. Although empirical evidence base for consistent surgical teams is lacking, we believe that the theoretical justifications may lay the groundwork for future research on the impact of deliberate staffing decisions by organizations, to complement the current emphasis on individual teamwork knowledge, skills and attitude. We also outline some of barriers based on our experience in our respective healthcare organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownMLParkerSEQuiñonezLGLiZSundtTM (2011). Can the impact of change of surgical teams in cardiovascular surgery be measured by operative mortality or morbidity? A propensity adjusted cohort comparison. Ann Surg. 253(2):385-92
2.
BurtscherM. J.ManserT. (2012). Team mental models and their potential to improve teamwork and safety: A review and implications for future research in healthcare. Safety Science, 50(5), 1344-1354
3.
Cannon-BowersJ.-A.SalasE.ConverseS. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In CastellanN. J.Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
de VriesE. N.PrinsH. A.CrollaR. M.den OuterA. J.van AndelG.van HeldenS. H.. (2010). Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med, 363(20), 1928-1937.
5.
ElBardissiAWWiegmannDAHenricksonSWadheraRSundtTM3rd (2008). Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 34(5):1027-33
6.
HaynesA.WeiserT.BerryW.LipzitzS.BreizatA.DellingerE. P.. (2009). A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 491-499.
7.
HaynesA. B.WeiserT. G.BerryW. R.LipsitzS. R.BreizatA. H.DellingerE. P.. (2011). Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf, 20(1), 102-107.
8.
GinnettR. (1993). Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. In WeinerE.KankiB.HelmreichR. L. (Eds.), Cockpit Resource Management (pp. 71-97). London: Academic Press.
9.
GittellJ. H.SeidnerR.WimbushJ. (2010). A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work. Organization Science, 21(2), 490-506
10.
GraetzIReedMShortellSMRundallTGBellowsJHsuJ (2014). The association between EHRs and care coordination varies by team cohesion. Health Serv Res. 2014Feb;49(1 Pt 2):438-52.
11.
GreenbergCCRegenbogenSELipsitzSRDiaz-FloresRGawandeAA (2008). The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count. Ann Surg, 248(2):337-41.
12.
MackenzieC. F.MartinP.XiaoY. (1996). Video analysis of prolonged uncorrected esophageal intubation. Level One Trauma Anesthesia Simulation Group. Anesthesiology, 84(6), 1494-1503.
13.
MichinovEOlivier-ChironERuschEChironB. (2008). Influence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identification in anaesthesia teams. Br J Anaesth. 2008Mar;100(3):327-32.
14.
NeilyJ.MillsP. D.Young-XuY.CarneyB. T.WestP.BergerD. H.. (2010). Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA, 304(15), 1693-1700.
15.
NielsenP. E.GoldmanM. B.MannS.ShapiroD. E.MarcusR. G.PrattS. D.. (2007). Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 109(1), 48-55.
16.
OrasanuJ.ParkeB.McDonnellL.RogersD.G. (2008). The psychosocial factor: A neglected aspect of team performance?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergnomics Society 52nd Annual meeting (Vol. 3, pp. 2067-2071). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergnomics Society.
17.
SerfatyD.EntinE. E.VolpeC. (1993). Adaptation to stress in team decision-making and coordinationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergnomics Society 37th Annual meeting (Vol. 2, pp. 1228-1232). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergnomics Society.
18.
TomekI. M.SabelA. L.FroimsonM. I.MuschlerG.JevsevarD. S.KoenigK. M.. (2012). A collaborative of leading health systems finds wide variations in total knee replacement delivery and takes steps to improve value. Health Aff (Millwood), 31(6), 1329-1338.
19.
WegnerD. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In MullinB.GoethalsG. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
20.
WiegmannD.A.EggmanA.A.ElBardissiA.WHenrickson ParkerS.SundtT.M.III (2010). Improving cardiac surgical care: A work systems approach. Applied Ergnomics, 41:701-712
21.
XiaoYParkerSHManserT (2013). Teamwork and Collaboration. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics8(1):55-102, 2013
22.
ZhangZ. X.HempelP. S.HanY. L.TjosvoldD. (2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. J Appl Psychol, 92(6), 1722-1730
