The electric vehicle (EV) technologies have received great attention due to the potential contributions to reducing emissions and energy consumption. The relatively short travel distance and battery lifetime of EV are major concerns for consumers. It is suggested that driver behavior plays important role in determining EV battery’s electric current and heat generation, which have effects on travel distance of EV and its battery lifetime. To address this problem, the current work proposes a Driver Speed Prediction-Based Battery Management System (P-BMS). P-BMS is able to innovatively predict both electric current and temperature of EV battery based on driver behavior, proactively manage and control both electric current and temperature level of the EV battery in order to minimize energy consumption and maximize both travel distance of EV and EV battery lifetime. Results suggest that P-BMS can significantly reduce energy, extend travel distance in one charge and prolong EV battery lifetime.
BowlesP.PengH.ZhangX. (2000). Energy management in a parallel hybrid electric vehicle with a continuously variable transmission.
3.
BruceP. G.ScrosatiB.TarasconJ. M. (2008). Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 47(16), 2930-2946.
4.
CassaniP. A.WilliamsonS. S. (2009). Feasibility analysis of a novel cell equalizer topology for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle energy-storage systems. Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 58(8), 3938-3946.
5.
De JonghP.NottenP. (2002). Effect of current pulses on lithium intercalation batteries. Solid State Ionics, 148(3), 259-268.
6.
DeffenbacherJ. L.LynchR. S.FilettiL. B.DahlenE. R.OettingE. R. (2003). Anger, aggression, risky behavior, and crash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers. Behaviour research and therapy, 41(3), 333-349.
7.
DominkoR.BeleM.GoupilJ.-M.GaberscekM.HanzelD.ArconI.JamnikJ. (2007). Wired porous cathode materials: a novel concept for synthesis of LiFePO4. Chemistry of materials, 19(12), 2960-2969.
8.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.BarrettP. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and individual differences, 6(1), 21-29.
9.
GuoY. G.HuJ. S.WanL. J. (2008). Nanostructured materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices. Advanced Materials, 20(15), 2878-2887.
LuL.HanX.LiJ.HuaJ.OuyangM. (2013). A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 226, 272-288.
12.
MillsA.Al-HallajS. (2005). Simulation of passive thermal management system for lithium-ion battery packs. Journal of Power Sources, 141(2), 307-315.
13.
MusardoC.RizzoniG.GuezennecY.StacciaB. (2005). A-ECMS: An adaptive algorithm for hybrid electric vehicle energy management. European Journal of Control, 11(4-5), 509.
14.
PetersonS. B.AptJ.WhitacreJ. (2010). Lithium-ion battery cell degradation resulting from realistic vehicle and vehicle-to-grid utilization. Journal of Power Sources, 195(8), 2385-2392.
15.
RamadassP.HaranB.WhiteR.PopovB. N. (2002). Capacity fade of Sony 18650 cells cycled at elevated temperatures: Part II. Capacity fade analysis. Journal of Power Sources, 112(2), 614-620.
16.
RamadassP.HaranB.WhiteR.PopovB. N. (2002a). Capacity fade of Sony 18650 cells cycled at elevated temperatures:: Part I. Cycling performance. Journal of Power Sources, 112(2), 606-613.
17.
RamadassP.HaranB.WhiteR.PopovB. N. (2002b). Capacity fade of Sony 18650 cells cycled at elevated temperatures:: Part II. Capacity fade analysis. Journal of Power Sources, 112(2), 614-620.
18.
SmithK.WangC.-Y. (2006). Power and thermal characterization of a lithium-ion battery pack for hybrid-electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 662-673.
WuC.WanJ.ZhaoG. (2012). Addressing human factors in electric vehicle system design: Building an integrated computational human–electric vehicle framework. Journal of Power Sources, 214, 319-329.
23.
XingY.MaE. W.TsuiK. L.PechtM. (2011). Battery management systems in electric and hybrid vehicles. Energies, 4(11), 1840-1857.
24.
ZhaoG.WuC.OuB. (2011). Mathematical modeling of average driver speed control with the integration of queuing network-model human processor and rule-based decision field theory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
