Older drivers experience increasing risks of vehicle crashes. This increase in crash risks has been associated with age-related declines in attention. To assess attentional failures during driving, we develop a self-report measure, the Attentional Failures during Driving Questionnaire (AFDQ). In this paper, we describe the development of the questionnaire and our preliminary effort to examine its reliability and validity via an online survey. The results demonstrated a high level of internal consistency of the questionnaire. In addition, we found that self-reported attentional failures during driving are not only associated with self-reported attentional and cognitive failures during other daily activities, but also related to unsafe driving behaviors and self-efficacy in driving. Our results also showed significant age-related differences in the AFDQ score: old-old drivers (age 75+) reported a higher level of attentional failures during driving than middle-aged drivers (age 25-64) and young-old drivers (age 65-74). These preliminary results indicate the potential use of AFDQ as a measure of attentional performance during driving for older drivers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkerstedtT.PetersB.AnundA.KecklundG. (2005). Impaired alertness and performance driving home from the night shift: a driving simulator study. Journal of Sleep Research, 14(1), 17-20.
2.
BallK.K.BeardBL.RoenkerD.L.MillerR.L.GriggsD.S. (1988). Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5(12), 2210-2219.
3.
BallK.K.OwsleyC.SloaneM.E.RoenkerD.L.BruniJ.R. (1993). Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes among older drivers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 34, 3110-3123.
4.
BerardiA.ParasuramanR.HaxbyJ. V. (2001). Overall vigilance and sustained attention decrements in healthy aging. Experimental Aging Research, 27(1), 19-39.
5.
BédardM.LeonardE.McAuliffeJ.WeaverB.GibbonsC.DuboisS. (2007). Visual attention and older drivers: The contribution of inhibition of return to safe driving. Experimental Aging Research, 32, 119-135.
6.
BroadbentD. E.CooperP. F.FitzGeraldP.ParkesK. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1-16.
7.
CarriereCheyneSmilek (2008). Everyday attention lapses and memory failures: The affective consequences of mindlessness. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 835-847.
8.
CoeckelberghT.M.BrouwerW.H.CornelissenF.W.van WolffelaarP.KooijmanA.C. (2002). The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: A driving simulator study. Archives of Ophthalmology, 120(11), 1509-1516.
9.
DellingerA.M.LangloisJ.A.LiG. (2002). Fatal crashes among older drivers: Decomposition of rtes into contributing factors. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155(3), 234-241.
10.
FengJ.MarulandaS.DonmezB. (in press). Susceptibility to driver distraction questionnaire (SDDQ): Development and relation to relevant self-reported measures. Transportation Research Record.
11.
GamacheP.HudonC.TeasdaleN.SimoneauM. (2010). Alternative avenues in the assessment of driving capacities in older drivers and implications for training. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 370-374.
12.
GeorgeS.ClarkM.CrottyM. (2007). Development of the Adelaide Driving Self-Efficacy Scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 56-61.
13.
HorswillM. S.AnsteyK. J.HatherlyC.WoodJ. M.PachanaN. A. (2011). Older drivers’ insight into their hazard perception ability. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(6), 2121-2127.
14.
HorswillM. S.MarringtonS. A.McCulloughC. M.WoodJ.PachanaN. A.McWilliamJ.RaikosM. K. (2008). The hazard perception ability of older drivers. Journal of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(4), 212-218.
15.
KesslerR. C.AdlerL.AmesM.DemlerO.FaraoneS.HiripiE. V. A. . . . WaltersE. E. (2005). The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological medicine, 35(02), 245-256.
16.
LajunenT.ParkerD.SummalaH. (2004). The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire: A cross-cultural study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(2), 231-238.
17.
LedesmaR.D.MontesS.A.PoóF.M.López-RamónM.F. (2010). Individual differences in driver inattention: The Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale, Traffic Injury Prevention, 11(2), 142-150.
18.
MaddenD. J.LangleyL. K. (2003). Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search. Psychology and aging, 18(1), 54.
19.
NovackT.A.BañosJ.H.AldersonA.L.SchneiderJ.J.WeedW.BlankenshipJ.SalisburyD. (2006). UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(5), 455-461.
20.
PosnerP.RothbartM.K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the Integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1-23.
21.
ReasonJ.MansteadA.StradlingS.BaxterJ.CampbellK. (1990). Errors and Violations on the Roads: a Real Distinction?Ergonomics, 33, 1315–1332.
22.
ReimerB.D’AmbrosioL.A.GilbertJ.CoughlinJ.F.BiedermanJ.SurmanC.FriedR.AleardiM. (2005). Behavior differences in drivers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: The driving behavior questionnaire. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 996-1004.
23.
TefftB. C. (2012). Motor vehicle crashes, injuries, and deaths in relation to driver age: United States, 1995-2010. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
24.
TrickL. M.EnnsJ. T.MillsJ.VavrikJ. (2004). Paying attention behind the wheel: a framework for studying the role of selective attention in driving. Theoretical issues in Ergonomic Science, 5(5), 385-424.
25.
TunP.A.WingfieldA. (1995). Does dividing attention become harder with age? Findings from the divided attention questionnaire. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2(1), 39-66.
