Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The U.S. Congress passed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act in 2012, which calls for a plan to integrate Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) into the National Airspace System (NAS). For UAS to be allowed to operate in the NAS, they will be required to “act and respond as manned aircraft do.” FAA regulations require that pilots respond promptly to air traffic controller (ATCo) commands. However, they do not quantify what an acceptable latency is. We maintain that research needs to be carried out to identify an acceptable latency in UAS responding, known as the “measured response.” While the measured response can be broken down into several components, the present paper provides an overview of how latencies in verbal communication and command execution can impact Pilot-ATCo communications and acceptability ratings when single and multiple UAS are operating in a simulated NAS environment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cardosi

K. M.

(1993) Time required for transmission of time-critical air traffic control messages in an en route environment. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(4), 303-313.

Cushing

(1995) Pilot-air traffic control communications: it’s not (only) what you say, it’s how you say it. Flight Safety Foundation, 14, 25-31.

Nadler

Mengert

DiSario

Grossberg

Spanier

(1993). Effects of satellite- and voice-switching-equipment transmission delays on air traffic control communications. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 315-325.

Prevot

(2002). Exploring the many perspectives of distributed air traffic management: The Multi Aircraft Control System: MACS. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, HCI-Aero 2002, 23-25 October, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Shively

R. J.

K.-P. L.

Buker

T. J.

(2013). Unmanned Aircraft System Response to Air Traffic Control Clearances: Measured Response. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 31–35. doi:10.1177/1541931213571009

Smith

E.C.

(2008). Analysis of controller-pilot communication performance in Area Navigation (RNAV) and conventional arrival operations. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2008. DASC 2008. IEEE/AIAA 27th, vol., no., pp.4.A.6-1-4.A6-12, 26-30 OCT. 2008.

K.-P. L.

Chiappe

Morales

Strybel

T. Z.

Battiste

Shively

R. J.

Buker

T. J.

(2013, under review). Impact of UAS Pilot Communication and Execution Latencies on Air Traffic Controller’s Acceptance of UAS Operations. Manuscript submitted for publication.

K.-P. L.

Strybel

T. Z.

Chiappe

Morales

Battiste

Shively

R. J.

(2014). Air Traffic Controller Performance and Acceptability of Multiple UAS in a Simulated NAS Environment. Paper accepted for the 2014 HCI-Aero Convention.

Measured Response for Multiple UAS in a Simulated NAS Environment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References