Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Military clothing and individual equipment (CIE) must not interfere with mission performance, including the ability to quickly and effectively acquire and engage targets. This paper describes a new methodology to evaluate the effects of CIE on marksmanship performance, beyond traditional lethality measures, by focusing on additional mobility timing metrics that entail locating, moving, positioning, and engaging the target. Sixteen participants were assessed in three legacy CIE conditions. Marksmanship was assessed using traditional lethality measures (p(hit), p(lethal hit), precision, and accuracy), mobility timing measure (target acquisition, aiming, and engagement), and subjective ratings. No significant differences of CIE condition for traditional lethality measures or time to aim/engage were found. However, participants experienced significantly longer target acquisition times for the more cumbersome CIE conditions, consistent with their perceived interference ratings. These results suggest that the new dynamic methodology provides valuable insights regarding the effects of CIE on performance in an operationally relevant manner.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baca

Kornfeind

(2012). Stability analysis of motion patterns in biathlon shooting. Human Movement Science, 31(2), 295-302.

Bensel

C.K.

(1997). Soldier performance and functionality: impact of chemical protective clothing. Military Psychology, 9(4), 287-300.

Brown

S.A.T

McNamara

J.A.

Choi

H.J.

Mitchell

K.B.

(2016). Assessment of a marksmanship simulator as a tool for clothing and individual equipment evaluation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 60th Annual Meeting, 60(1), 1424-1428.

Carbone

P.D.

Carlton

S.D.

Stierli

Orr

R.M.

(2014). The impact of load carriage on the marksmanship of the tactical police officer: a pilot study. Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning. 22(2), 50-57.

Chung

G.K.

Delacruz

G.C.

deVries

L.F.

Bewley

W.L.

Baker

E.L.

(2006). New directions in rifle marksmanship research. Military Psychology, 18(2), 161-179.

Choi

H. J.

Mitchell

K. B.

Garlie

McNamara

Hennessy

Carson

(2016). Effects of Body Armor Fit on Marksmanship Performance. Advs in Phys Ergonomics and Human Factors, 341-354.

Crowley

J.C.

Hallmark

B.W.

Shanley

M.G.

Sollinger

J.M.

(2014). Changing the army’s weapon training strategies to meet operational requirements more efficiently and effectively. RAND Corporation Research Report, RAND Arroyo Center, Santa Monica, CA.

Hagman

J.D.

(2000). Basic rifle marksmanship training with the laser marksmanship training system (Research Report 1761). U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Hawkins

R.N.

Sefton

J.M.

(2011). Effects of stance width on performance and postural stability in National-Standard pistol shooters. Journal of Sports Science, 29(13), 1381-1387.

10.

Headquarters DOA. (2012). Soldier’s manual of common tasks: Warrior skills level 1. (STP 21-1-SMCT). Washington, DC.

11.

Johnson

R.F.

Kobrick

J.L.

(1997). Effects of wearing chemical protective clothing on rifle marksmanship and on sensory and psychomotor tasks. Military Psychology, 9(4), 301-314.

12.

Johnson

R.F.

McMenemy

D.J.

Dauphinee

D.T.

(1990). Rifle marksmanship with three types of combat clothing. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, 1529-1532.

13.

McNamara

Choi

H.J.

Brown

S.A.T.

Mitchell

(2016). Evaluating the effects of clothing and individual equipment on marksmanship performance using a novel five target methodology. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 60th Annual Meeting, 60(1), 2043-2047.

14.

Palmer

C.J.

Bigelow

Van Emmerik

(2013). Defining soldier equipment trade space: load effects on combat marksmanship and action-perception coupling. Ergonomics, 56(11), 1708-1721

15.

Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier. (2015). Soldier systems integration dismounted baseline version 2.0. Fort Belvoir, VA.

16.

Schendel

J.D.

Heller

F. H.

Finley

D.L.

Hawley

J.K.

(1985). Use of weaponeer marksmanship trainer in predicting M16A1 rifle qualification performance. Human Factors, 27 (3), 313-325.

17.

Schmidt

R.A.

Lee

T.D.

(1999). Motor control and learning: a behavior approach. Human Kinetics, Champaign.

18.

Shaw

Kinsella-Shaw

(2007). The survival value of informed awareness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(1-2), 137-154.

19.

Tharion

W.J.

Shukitt-Hale

Lieberman

H. R.

(2003). Caffeine effects on marksmanship during high-stress military training with 72 hours sleep deprivation. Aviation, Space, and Env. Medicine, 74(4), 309-314.

20.

Torre

J. P.

Maxey

J. L.

Piper

A. S.

(1987). Live fire and simulator marksmanship performance with the M16A1 rifle, Study I: A validation of the artificial intelligence direct fire weapons research test bed. Volume I: Main Report. Volume II: Appendixes (Tech.Memo7-87). U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory and U.S. Army Project Manager for Training Devices: Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

21.

U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit (USAMU) Fort Benning. (2015, January 13). Meeting on marksmanship training and performance. Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA.

22.

Warber

J. P.

Tharion

W. J.

Patton

J. E.

(2002). The effect of creatine monohydrate supplementation on obstacle course and multiple bench press performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 16(4), 500-508.

Dynamic Marksmanship: A Novel Methodology to Evaluate the Effects of Clothing and Individual Equipment on Mission Performance

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References