The Youmans Cognitive Flexibility Assessment (YCFA) was created as an easy-to-administer and entertaining assessment of cognitive flexibility. Although a validation and reliability study of the YCFA was conducted, practice effects were not assessed. This present study aims to uncover whether practice effects occur for the YCFA. Thirty-six undergraduate university students completed four rounds of the YCFA (six trials per round). Practice effects occurred in the first and second rounds, but task performance stabilized after the third round. Implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FigueroaI. J.YoumansR. J. (2011). Developing an Easy-to-Administer, Objective, and Valid Assessment of Cognitive Flexibility. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 944-948. doi:10.1177/1071181311551196
2.
FigueroaI. J.YoumansR. J.ShawT. H. (2013). Cognitive Flexibility and Sustained Attention: See something, say something (even when it’s not there). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 954-958. doi:10.1177/1541931214581200
3.
GonzalezC. A.FigueroaI. J.BellowsB. G.RhodesD.YoumansR. J. (2013). A New Behavioral Measure of Cognitive Flexibility. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 297-306. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0_33
4.
GonzalezC. APrattS. M.BensonW.FigueroaI. J.RhodesD.YoumansR. J. (2012). Creating a Computerized Assessment of Cognitive Flexibility with a User-Friendly Participant and Experimenter Interface. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1942-1946. doi:10.1177/1071181312561286
5.
GonzalezC. A.YoumansR. J. (2013). The Youmans Cognitive Flexibility Assessment: A Researcher Manual for Optimal Use. Retrieved from Sourceforge.net:http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/cfpuzzle
6.
GrantD.A.BergE.A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404-411.
7.
HausknechtJ. P.HalpertJ. A.PaoloN. T.GerrardM. O. (2007). Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 373-385. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.373
8.
MatthewsG.DaviesD.WestermanS. J.StammersR. B. (2000). Human performance: Cognition, stress, and individual differences (pp. 107-124). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
9.
OswaldF. L.McAbeeS. T.RedickT. S.HambrickD. Z. (2015). The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity. Behavioral Research Methods, 47(4), 1343-1355. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0543-2
10.
ScottW. A. (1962). Cognitive Complexity and Cognitive Flexibility. Sociometry, 25(4), 405. doi:10.2307/2785779
11.
SpiroR. J.FeltovichP. J.JacobsonM. J.CoulsonR. L. (1991). Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. Educause Review, 5, 24-33.
