Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between a product’s degree of usability and its degree of beauty. Both directions of causality have been demonstrated leading to “what is beautiful is usable” and “what is usable is beautiful hypothesis. Additionally, aesthetic research has demonstrated several principles that elicit a consistent pattern of responses. The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between aesthetics and usability by means of a functional prime. Forty participants rated sixteen stimuli manipulated on four aesthetic principles; prototypicality, symmetry, composition, and shape. Mixed results indicate that certain aesthetic principles interact with one another in a functional usage.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bar

Neta

(2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological science, 17(8), 645-648.

Ben-Bassat

Meyer

Tractinsky

(2006). Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value of aesthetics and usability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 13(2), 210-234.

Hamborg

K.-C.

Hülsmann

Kaspar

(2014). The interplay between usability and aesthetics: More evidence for the “what is usable is beautiful” notion. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2014, 15.

Hassenzahl

(2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), 319-349.

Jacobsen

Höfel

(2002). Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments. Perceptual and motor skills, 95(3), 755-766.

Kahneman

Frederick

(2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 49.

Konkle

Oliva

(2011). Canonical visual size for real- world objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 23.

Mahlke

(2007). Aesthetic and symbolic qualities as antecedents of overall judgements of interactive products People and computers XX—Engage (pp. 57-64): Springer.

Palmer

S. E.

Schloss

K. B.

Sammartino

(2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual review of psychology, 64, 77-107.

10.

Sammartino

Palmer

S. E.

(2012). Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: Effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 865.

11.

Tractinsky

Katz

A. S.

Ikar

(2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with computers, 13(2), 127-145.

12.

Tuch

A. N.

Roth

S. P.

HornbæK

Opwis

Bargas-Avila

J. A.

(2012). Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1596-1607.

13.

Van Schaik

Ling

(2008). Modelling user experience with web sites: Usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness. Interacting with computers, 20(3), 419-432.

Do Aesthetic Design Principles Predict Visual Appeal of a Simple Control Panel?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References