Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The measurement of technology behaviors occurs in everyday interactions with websites and smart devices, and can be applied to customize interfaces to improve users’ experiences as well as increasing revenues via targeted ads. This is possible because technology behaviors can reflect underlying personal and psychological characteristics about users that can be utilized to deliver custom-tailored content to each user. Texting is a one technology behavior that has been shown to be associated with a variety of psychological variables, including personality, depression, and anxiety, and has been shown to relate to socio-developmental differences among different age groups. Thus, the measurement of texting behaviors could have potential applications for researchers and practitioners. The present study examined a new scale to measure texting behavior: the Texting Behaviors Index (TBX; Schroeder & Sims, 2017), alongside two scales that measure problematic aspects of mobile phone use (Merlo, Stone, & Bibbey, 2013) and motivations for texting (Reid & Reid, 2007). Results indicate that measures from the TBX converge with the other texting scales, and support the TBX’s usefulness as a measure of texting behavior.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albergotti

(2014, June 12). Facebook to target ads based on Web browsing. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/face-book-to-give-advertisers-data-about-users-web-browsing-1402561120

Anderson

Perrin

(2016). 13% of Americans don’t use the internet. Who are they?. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/07/some-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/

Bailey

S.K.T.

Schroeder

B.L.

Whitmer

D.E.

Sims

V.K.

(2016). Perceptions of mobile instant messaging apps are comparable to texting for young adults in the United States. Proceedings of the 60th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60, 1235-1239.

Ehrenberg

A. L.

Juckes

S. C.

White

K. M.

Walsh

S. P.

(2008) Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people’s technology use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 739-741.

Gibbs

(2014, July 2). Facebook apologises for psychological experiments on users. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/02/facebook-apologises-psychological-experiments-on-users

Greenwood

Perrin

Duggan

(2015). Social Media Update 2016. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/factsheet/social-media/

Holtgraves

(2011). Text messaging, personality, and the social context. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 92-99.

Kramer

A. D. I.

Guillory

J. E.

Hancock

J. T.

(2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788-8790.

Lardinois

(2015, September 1). Google launches native ads in Gmail to all advertisers. Techcrunch. Retrieved from techcrunch.com/2015/09/01/google-launches-new-native-ad-format-ingmail/

10.

Lenhart

Ling

Campbell

Purcell

(2010). Teens and Mobile Phones [Research Report]. Pew Research Center: Washington, D.C.

11.

Lister

K. M.

(2010). Compulsive text messaging: Do youth need to kick the behavior? (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved August, 5, 2015 from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/10?214228908672494::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:49483

12.

Merlo

L. J.

Stone

A. M.

Bibbey

(2013). Measuring problematic phone use: Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the PUMP scale. Journal of Addiction, 2013, 1-7.

13.

Meyer

M. N.

(2014, June 30). Everything you need to know about Facebook’s controversial emotion experiment. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2014/06/everything-you-need-to-know-about-facebooks-manipulative-experiment/

14.

Reid

D. J.

Reid

F. J. M.

(2007). Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(3), 424-435.

15.

Schroeder

B. L.

Sims

V.K.

(2015). Problematic texting behaviors: Individual differences in personality. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59, 907-911.

16.

Schroeder

B. L.

Sims

V. K.

(2017, April 27). Texting as a multidimensional behavior: Individual differences and measurement of texting behaviors. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000148

17.

Schroeder

B. L.

Whitmer

D. E.

Bailey

S. K. T.

Sims

V. K.

(2016). Individual differences in middle school and college students’ texting. Proceedings of the 60th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60, 1215-1219.

18.

Schwartz

H. A.

Eichstaedt

J. C.

Kern

M. L.

Dziurzynski

Ramones

Agrawal

…Ungar

L. H.

(2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLOS One, 8(9): e73791. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073791

19.

Shepard

S. L.

Schroeder

B. L.

Sims

V. K.

(2017, January). Escapist texting: The role of personality and social anxiety. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.

20.

Smith

Anderson

(2016). Online shopping and e-commerce. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/19/online-shopping-and-e-commerce/

21.

Smith

Rainie

McGeeney

Keeter

Duggan

(2015). US smartphone use in 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/

22.

Thomée

Härenstam

Hagberg

(2011). Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults – a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 11(66), 1-11.

Measurement of Technology Behaviors: A Look at Texting Scales

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References