Construction Ergonomics: Concrete Bit Wear Increases Handle Vibration and Drilling Time

Abstract

The use of large electric hammer and pneumatic drills exposes construction workers to high levels of hand vibration that may lead to hand arm vibration syndrome and other musculoskeletal disorders. This hammer drill test bench study demonstrated a small but significant increase in z-axis handle vibration (4.8 to 5.1 m/s2; ISO weighted) and drilling time per hole (7.8 to 12.3 s) with worn concrete bits when compared to a new bit. Drill bit manufactures may consider advising contractors that worn bits will increase the exposure of workers to hand vibration and will reduce worker productivity. Construction contractors should adopt a bit replacement program based on bit wear patterns in order to reduce exposure level and drilling time to hazardous hand vibration.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abtahi

Butt

Molgaard

Arvani

: Wear analysis and optimization on impregnated diamond bits in vibration assisted rotary drilling (VARD). 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 26-29 June 2011, San Francisco. American Rock Mechanics Association; 11-266 (2011).

ACGIH: 2017 TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values, ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH (2017).

Antonucci

Barr

Martin

Rempel

Effect of bit wear on hammer drill handle vibration and productivity. J Occup and Environ Hygiene (2017; in press).

Botti

Mora

Antonucci

Carty

Barr

Rempel

Carbide-tipped bit wear patterns and productivity with concrete drilling. Wear (2017; in press).

Bovenzi

.: Health effects of mechanical vibration. G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 27:58-64 (2005).

Carty

Cooper

Barr

Neitzel

Balmes

Rempel

The effects of bit wear on respirable silica dust, noise and productivity: A hammer drill bench study. Annals Work Exposures and Health (2017; in press).

European Community Directive 2002/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration). The Official Journal of the European Communities; 45:13–19 (2002).

Griffin

M.J.

Howarth

H.V.C.

Pitts

P.M.

et al .: Guide to good practice on Hand-Arm Vibration. Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work. EU Good Practice Guide HAV, V7.7. Luxembourg, European Commission (2006).

ISO 28927-5 & -10: Hand-held portable power tools – Test methods for evaluation of vibration emission – Part 5: Drills and impact drills & – Part 10: Percussive drills, hammers and breakers. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2011).

10.

ISO 5349-1 & -2: Mechanical vibration – Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to and- transmitted vibration – Part 1: General requirements & – Part 2: Practical guidance for measurement at the workplace. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2001).

11.

Nataletti

Marchetti

Lunghi

et al .: Occupational exposure to mechanical vibration: the Italian vibration database for risk assessment. Int J Occup Saf Ergon;14(4):379-86 (2008).

12.

Palmer

K.T.

Griffin

M.J.

Syddall

et al .: Risk of hand-arm vibration syndrome according to occupation and sources of exposure to hand- transmitted vibration: A national survey. Am J Ind Med; 39(4):389–96 (2001).

13.

Phillips

J.I.

Heyns

P.S.

Nelson

: Rock Drills used in South African Mines: a Comparative Study of Noise and Vibration Levels. Ann Occup Hyg; 51(2):305–310 (2007).

14.

Rempel

Barr

Antonucci

: A new test bench system for hammer drills: Validation for handle vibration. Int J Ind Ergon; (2017, in press, E- pub).