High traction flooring and slip-resistant shoes are often used to reduce slip and fall accidents. However, the relative contribution and interactions across these parameters on available coefficient of friction (ACOF) are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of flooring and slip-resistant shoes on ACOF. Seventeen shoes, five flooring tiles and three contaminants were tested using a robotic slip-tester, while ACOF was measured. ACOF was higher for slip-resistant shoes than not slip-resistant shoes. Larger effects were observed for shoe classification compared with flooring. Interaction effects indicated that the gap across shoe classifications was greater for the high ACOF floorings compared to the low ACOF floorings. This study suggests that the benefit of combining high traction flooring and slip-resistant shoes exceed the summed benefit of these factors and has the potential to reduce slipping events.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertD.L.MoyerB.BeschornerK.E.2017. Three-dimensional shoe kinematics during unexpected slips: Implications for shoe-floor friction testing. IIE: Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors5, 1-11.
2.
AschanC.HirvonenM.MannelinT. E. R., 2005. Development and validation of a novel portable slip simulator. Applied Ergonomics36, 585-593.
3.
ASTM, 2012. ASTM F2508-12a: Standard Practice for Validation, Calibration, and Certification of Walkway Tribometers Using Reference Surfaces. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
4.
BeschornerK.E.AlbertD.L.RedfernM.S.2016. Required coefficient of friction during level walking is predictive of slipping. Gait & Posture.
5.
BeschornerK.E.SinghG., Year A Novel Method for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Shoe-Tread Designs Relevant to Slip and Fall Accidents. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Boston, MA.
6.
BlanchetteM.G.PowersC.M.2015. The influence of footwear tread groove parameters on available friction. Applied ergonomics50, 237-241.
7.
ChangW.-R.GrönqvistR.HirvonenM.MatzS.2004. The effect of surface waviness on friction between Neolite and quarry tiles. Ergonomics47, 890-906.
8.
ChangW.-R.KimI.-J.ManningD.P.BunterngchitY.2001. The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness. Ergonomics44, 1200-1216.
9.
ChangW.R.CourtneyT.K.GronqvistR.RedfernM.S., 2003. Measuring slipperiness-discussions on the state of the art and future research, in: ChangW.R.CourtneyT.K. (Eds.), Measuring Slipperiness: Human Locomotion and Surface Factors. Taylor & Francis, London & New York.
10.
CourtneyT.K.SorockG.S.ManningD.P.CollinsJ.W.Holbein-JennyM.A., 2001. Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries–can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated?Ergonomics44, 1118-1137.
11.
HansonJ.P.RedfernM.S.MazumdarM.1999. Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. Ergonomics42, 1619-1633.
12.
IraqiA.ChamR.BeschornerK.E., Year Assessment of slip-risk using a portable slip simulator. In American Society of Biomechanics. Columbus, OH.
13.
LiK.W.ChenC.J.2004. The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants. Applied ergonomics35, 499-507.
14.
LiK.W.ChenC.J.2005. Effects of tread groove orientation and width of the footwear pads on measured friction coefficients. Safety Science43, 391-405.
15.
LiK.W.WuH.H.LinY.-C.2006. The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants. Applied Ergonomics37, 743-748.
16.
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 2016. 2016 Liberty Mutual Workplace Safety Index, Hopkinton, MA.
17.
RedfernM.S.ChamR.Gielo-PerczakK.GrönqvistR.HirvonenM.LanshammarH.MarpetM.Pai IVC.Y.-C.PowersC.2001. Biomechanics of slips. Ergonomics44, 1138-1166.
18.
StrandbergL.LanshammarH.1981. The dynamics of slipping accidents. Journal of Occupational Accidents3, 153-162.
19.
TsaiY.J.PowersC.M.2008. The Influence of Footwear Sole Hardness on Slip Initiation in Young Adults*. Journal of forensic sciences53, 884-888.
20.
U.S. Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2016. Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Requiring Days Away From Work: Chart 15: Distribution of injuries and illnesses by event or exposure, all ownerships, 2015, Washington, D.C.
21.
VermaS.K.ChangW.R.CourtneyT.K.LombardiD.A.HuangY.-H.BrennanM.J.MittlemanM.A.WareJ.H.PerryM.J., 2011. A prospective study of floor surface, shoes, floor cleaning and slipping in US limited-service restaurant workers. Occupational and environmental medicine68, 279-285.
22.
VermaS.K.ZhaoZ.CourtneyT.K.ChangW.-R.LombardiD.A.HuangY.-H.BrennanM.J.PerryM.J., 2014. Duration of slip-resistant shoe usage and the rate of slipping in limited-service restaurants: results from a prospective and crossover study. Ergonomics57, 1919-1926.
23.
YamaguchiT.KatsurashimaY.HokkirigawaK.2017. Effect of rubber block height and orientation on the coefficients of friction against smooth steel surface lubricated with glycerol solution. Tribology International.
