Marksmanship is a core competency every U.S. Army Soldier must attain in order to achieve combat readiness (James & Dyer, 2011). To enhance overall marksmanship proficiency, the current research aims to develop a model to predict Soldier marksmanship qualification scores based on individual differences. The results of the current study found several psychomotor, cognitive, and affective variables predicted marksmanship qualification scores. These findings bring research a step closer to identifying skill deficiencies and individual needs prior to training. More research is needed to maximize understanding and improvement of marksmanship performance and to improve overall combat readiness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22(2), 227-257.
2.
AckermanP. L.CiancioloA. T. (2000). Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(4), 259.
3.
AckermanP. L. (2007). New developments in understanding skilled performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 235-239.
4.
AudeS. N.BrysonJ.Keller-GlazeH.NicelyK.VowelsC. L. (2014). Preparing Brigade Combat Team Soldiers for Mission Readiness Through Research on Intangible Psychological Constructs and Their Applications: Phase 1 (ARI Technical Report No. 1336). Fort Belvoir, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
5.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
6.
BanduraA. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5, 307-337.
7.
BanduraA. (2014). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In SchwarzerR. (Ed). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
8.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 745-767.
9.
BartoneP. T. (2006). Resilience Under Military Operational Stress: Can Leaders Influence Hardiness?Military Psychology, 18, 131–148.
10.
BloomB. S.EngelhartM. D.FurstE. J.HillW. H.KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
11.
ClavarelliA.PlatteW. L.PowersJ. J. (2009). Teaching and assessing complex skills in simulation with application to rifle marksmanship training. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
12.
ChaseW. G.SimonH. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive psychology, 4(1), 55-81.
13.
ChungG. K.CruzG. C.VriesL. F. D.KimJ. O.BewleyW. L.SouzaESilvaA. A. D.. . . BakerE. L. (2004). Determinants of rifle marksmanship performance: Predicting shooting performance with advanced distributed learning assessments. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
14.
ChungG. K.DelacruzG. C.de VriesL. F.BewleyW. L.BakerE. L. (2006). New Directions in Rifle Marksmanship Research. Military Psychology, 18(2), 161.
15.
ChungG. K.NagashimaS. O.DelacruzG. C.LeeJ. J.WainessR.BakerE. L. (2011). Review of Rifle Marksmanship Training Research (CRESST Technical Report No. 783). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
16.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.
17.
Department of the Army. (2006a). Field Manual 3-0. Operations. Washington, D.C.
18.
Department of the Army. (2006b). Field Manual 7-0. Training for full spectrum operations. Washington, D.C.
19.
Department of the Army (2008, August). Rifle marksmanship M16-/M4-series weapons (FM 3-22.9). Washington, DC.
20.
DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.
21.
EricssonK. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, 38, 685-705.
22.
EricssonK. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, 38, 685-705.
23.
FayD.FreseM. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97-124.
24.
FittsP. M.PosnerM. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA.: Brooks-Cole.
25.
FreseM.KringW.SooseA.ZempelJ. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63.
26.
FleishmanE. A. (1954). Dimensional analysis of psychomotor abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(6), 437-454.
27.
GrossklagsJ.ReitterD. (2014, July). How task familiarity and cognitive predispositions impact behavior in a security game of timing. Proceedings from The 2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 111-122.
28.
GebhardP. (2005, July). Alma: a layered model of affect. Proceedings from The 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’05). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ACM Press, 29–36
29.
GrossmanR.SalasE. (2011). The transfer of training: what really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103-120.
30.
GullyS.ChenG. (2010). Individual differences, attribute-treatment interactions, and training outcomes. In KozlowskiS.W.J.SalasE. (Eds.). Learning, training, and development in organizations. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group, 3-64.
31.
HaibachP.ReidG.CollierD. (2011). Motor learning and development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
32.
JamesD. R.DyerJ. L. (2011). Rifle marksmanship diagnostic and training guide. Fort Benning, GA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
33.
MacDonaldK. (2007). Ecological hypotheses for human brain evolution: evidence for skill and learning processes in the ethnographic literature on hunting. Guts and Brains, 107-132.
34.
MerritR. D. (2008). The Psychomotor Domain. EBSCO Research Starters.
35.
PlassJ. L.MorenoR.BrünkenR. (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PojmanN.BehnemanA.KintzN.JohnsonR.ChungG.NagashimaS.. . . BerkaC. (2009). Characterizing the Psychophysiological Profile of Expert and Novice Marksmen. Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 524-532.
37.
SimpsonE. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain: The psychomotor domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.
38.
SottilareR. (2015). Challenges in moving adaptive training and education from state-of-art to state-of-practice. Presented at Developing a Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT): Informing Design through a Community of Practice Workshop at the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Madrid, Spain.
39.
SpainR. D.PriestH. A.MurphyJ. S. (2012). Current trends in adaptive training with military applications: An introduction. Military Psychology, 24(2), 87-95. doi:10.1080/08995605.2012.676984
40.
SwellerJ. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
41.
TannenbaumS. I.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.MathieuJ. E. (1993). Factors that influence training effectiveness: A conceptual model and longitudinal analysis (Technical Rep. No. 93011). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
42.
TierneyT. J.JrCartnerJ. A.ThompsonT. J. (1979). Basic rifle marksmanship test: Trainee pretest and posttest attitudes (No. ARI-TP-354). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
43.
ThompsonT. J.SmithS.MoreyJ. C.OsborneA. D. (1980). Effectiveness of improved basic rifle marksmanship training programs. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
