The Usability of Blood Glucose Meters: Task Performance Differences Between Younger and Older Age Groups

Abstract

This study examines the overall usability of current, commercially available self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) meters in order to highlight how the design affects the performance of younger and older adults. Sixteen younger participants (18-27) and 29 elderly participants (65-85) attempted to complete two tasks: 1) set date/time and 2) perform a control solution test, using two meters: the Accu-Check Compact Plus® and 2) the One Touch Ultra 2®. Overall, elderly participants had significantly more difficulty completing the two tasks and committed significantly more errors than younger participants. When using the Accu-Chek® meter to set the date and time 79% of elderly adults failed compared to 12% of younger adults. When using the One Touch® meter, 21% of elderly adults failed to complete the task while none of the younger adults failed. Across the two tasks, elderly participants made, on average, an additional 1.6 errors compared to those in the younger group.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAMI Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. (2009). American National Standard. Human factors engineering-Design of medical devices. Retrieved from: http://marketplace.aami.org/eseries/scriptcontent/docs/Preview%20Files/HE750910_preview.pdf

ADA American Diabetes Association. (2015). Fast facts: data and statistics about diabetes. Retrieved from:http://professional.diabetes.org/sites/professional.diabetes.org/files/media/fast_facts_12-2015a.pdf

Bergenstal

(2008). Evaluating the accuracy of modern glucose meters. Insulin, 3(5), 5-14.

Bergenstal

Pearson

Cembrowski

Bina

Davidson

List

(2000). Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: Proposed guidelines to improve accuracy. The Diabetes Educator, 26(6), 981-989.doi: 10.1177/014572170002600610

Carpenter

E.D.

Mayhorn

C.B.

(2011). Effect of transfer with younger and older adults on control solution testing using two blood glucometers. Human Factors and Ergonomic Society, 55, 167-171.

CDA. (2014). Complications. Retrieved from http://www.diabetes.ca/diabetes-and-you/complications

Czaja

Charness

Fisk

Hertzog

Nair

Rogers

Sharit

(2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology of Aging21(2), 333-352.

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (DCCT). (1993). The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(14), 977-986.

Florez

J.C.

Hirschhorn

Altshuler

(2003). The inherited basis of diabetes mellitus: Implications for the genetic analysis of complex trials. Annual Review of Genomics Human Genetics, 4, 257-291.

10.

Ghisletta

Spini

(2004) An introduction to generalized estimating equations and an application to assess selectivity effects in a longitudinal study on very old individuals. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Studies, 29(4), 421-437.

11.

Ginsberg

B.H.

(2009). Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: Sources of errors in measurement. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 3(4), 903-913.

12.

Hewitt

Smeeth

Chaturvedi

Bulpitt

Fletcher

(2011). Self-management and patient understanding of diabetes in the older person. Diabetic Medicine, 28(1), 117-122. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03142.x

13.

IBM Corp. (Released 2011). IBM SPSS advanced statistics, version 20. Armonk, NY.

14.

Liang

Zeger

(1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13-22.

15.

Ligthelm

Kaiser

Vora

Yale

(2012). Insulin use in elderly adults: Risk of hypoglycemia and strategies for care. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 60(8), 1564-1570.

16.

Malloy

Alemayehu

Roberts

(1991). Reliability of a standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(1), 102-105.

17.

Mayhorn

Carpenter

(2012). Age differences and transfer control solution testing with blood glucometers. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41(S1), 370-373.

18.

Mykityshyn

Fisk

Rogers

(2002). Learning to use a home medical device: Mediating age-related difference with training. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(3), 354-364.

19.

Tao

(2013). Age differences in computer device use: A comparison of touchscreen, trackball and mouse. Advances in Information Systems and Technology, 206, 1015-1024.

20.

Rogers

Fisk

(2010). Toward a psychological science of advanced design for older adults. Journal of Gerontology Series B,65b(6), 645-653.

21.

Shadish

Cook

Campbell

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs: For generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

22.

Statistics Canada. (2016). Diabetes. Retrieved from:http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-229-x/2009001/status/dia-eng.htm.

23.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (UKPDS). (1998). Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet, 352, 837-853.