Sleep problems are prevalent in the naval operational environment. Crewmembers attribute some of these problems to habitability-related issues in their berthing compartments. This study has two goals: first, to assess the provisions in current habitability standards used in ship design; and second, to assess the extent to which habitability factors in berthing compartments affect the sleep of crewmembers in United States Navy (USN) ships. Results from eight field studies show that environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, noise, light, air quality) affect sleep quality in berthing spaces. Despite the provisions in current standards, sleep-related habitability issues remain a concern for crewmembers in the USN. Our findings suggest that living conditions may be improved in berthing compartments by revising current standards. We have identified three areas for improvement: noise (both continuous and intermittent), temperature within the compartment, and designing berthing compartments according to the organizational structure of the ship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABS. (2016). Guide for crew habitability on ships. Houston, TX: American Bureau of Shipping.
2.
ASTM. (2013). Standard practice for human engineering design for marine systems, equipment, and dacilities (ASTM F1166-07). West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials International.
3.
ASTM. (2015). Standard practice for human system integration program requirements for ships and marine systems, equipment, and facilities (ASTM F1337-10). West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials International.
4.
BerresD. S. (1955). Habitability on naval ships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New York, NY.
5.
DoD. (1995). Handbook for human engineering design guidelines (MIL-HDBK-759C) (pp. 363). Washington, DC: US Department of Defence.
6.
DoD. (2012). Design Criteria Standard: Human Engineering (MIL-STD-1472G) (pp. 219). Washington, DC: US Department of Defence.
7.
DoD. (2015). Design criteria standard for noise limits (MIL-STD-1474E). Washington, DC: US Department of Defence.
8.
HalperinD. (2014). Environmental noise and sleep disturbances: A threat to health?Sleep Science, 7(4), 209-212.
9.
HaskellE. H.PalcaJ. W.WalkerJ. M.BergerR. J.HellerH. C. (1981). The effects of high and low ambient temperatures on human sleep stages. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 51(5), 494-501.
10.
ILO. (2006). Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) Title 3. Accommodation, recreational facilities, food and catering. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
11.
MatsangasP.MillerN. L. (2006). The effects of ship motion on the sleeping patterns of crewmembers aboard a high speed Naval vessel. Sleep, 29(Suppl. S), A126-A126.
12.
McCauleyM. E.MatsangasP.MillerN. L. (2005). Motion and fatigue study in high speed vessel operations: Phase 1 report. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
13.
MillerN. L.MatsangasP.KenneyA. (2012). The Role of Sleep in the Military: Implications for Training and Operational Effectiveness. In LaurenceJ. H.MatthewsM. D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Military Psychology (pp. 262–281). New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
MillerN. L.McCauleyM. E.MatsangasP. (2005). Ship’s Motion Effects on Crew Performance: Analysis of Sleep and Sleepiness on High Speed Vessel (HSV). Naval Postgraduate School.
15.
NATO. (1990a). Guidelines fir environmental factors in NATO surface ships: Acoustical, climatic, vibration, colour, illumination (Allied Naval Engineering Publication ANEP-25) (pp. 81): North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
16.
NATO. (1990b). Guidelines for the acoustical environment in NATO surface ships (pp. 14): North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
NATO. (1993). Ergornomic data for shipboard space design in NATO surface ships (Allied Naval Engineering Publication ANEP-26): North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
19.
NAVSEA. (2016). Shipboard habitability design criteria and practices manual(surface ships) for new ship designs and modernization (T9640-AC- DSP-010/HAB Rev.1) (pp. 175): Naval Sea Systems Command.
20.
OPNAV. (2012). Shipboard habitability program (OPNAVINST 9640.1B). Washington, D.C.: Department of the Navy.
21.
ShattuckN. L.MatsangasP. (2015). Operational assessment of the 5-h on/10-h off watchstanding schedule on a US Navy ship: Sleep patterns, mood, and psychomotor vigilance performance of crew members in the nuclear reactor department. Ergonomics, 59(5), 657-664. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1073794
22.
ShattuckN. L.MatsangasP.BrownS. (2015). A comparison between the 3/9 and the 5/10 watchbills (Technical Report Report No. NPS-OR-15-006). Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
23.
ShattuckN. L.MatsangasP.PowleyE. H. (2015). Sleep patterns, mood, psychomotor vigilance performance, and command resilience of watchstanders on the “five and dime” watchbill (Technical Report No. NPS-OR-15-003). Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
24.
SteinN. I.BenelR. A.MaloneT. (1983). An overview of the role of the NAVSEA Human Factors Engineering program in ship design. Naval Engineers Journal, 95(4), 139-152.
25.
SundeE.BråtveitM.PallesenS.MoenB. E. (2016). Noise and sleep on board vessels in the Royal Nowegian Navy. Noise and Health, 18(81), 85-92.
26.
WilcoveG. L.SchwerinM. J. (2008). Shipboard habitability in the U.S. Navy. Military Psychology, 20(2), 115-133.
