Analysis of criminal activity based on offenders’ social networks is an established procedure in intelligence analysis. The complexity of the data poses an obstacle for analysts to gauge network developments, e.g. detect emerging problems. Visualization is a powerful tool to achieve this, but it is essential to know how the analysts’ sense-making strategies can be supported most efficiently. Based on a think aloud study we identified ten cognitive strategies on a general level to be useful for designers. We also provide some examples how these strategies can be supported through appropriate visualizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlperB.BachB.Henry RicheN.IsenbergT.FeketeJ.-D. (2013). Weighted graph comparison techniques for brain connectivity analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 483–492). ACM.
2.
ArchambaultD.AbelloJ.KennedyJ.KobourovS.MaK.-L.MikschS.MuelderC.TeleaA. C. (2014). Temporal Multivariate Networks. In KerrenA.PurchaseH. C.WardM. O. (Eds.), Multivariate Network Visualization (pp. 151–174). Springer International Publishing.
3.
BachB.Henry-RicheN.DwyerT.MadhyasthaT.FeketeJ. D.GrabowskiT. (2015). Small MultiPiles: Piling time to explore temporal patterns in dynamic networks. In Computer Graphics Forum (Vol. 34, pp. 31–40).
4.
BeckF.BurchM.DiehlS.WeiskopfD. (2014). The state of the art in visualizing dynamic graphs. In EuroVis - STARs (pp. 83–103). Eurographics Association.
5.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. MIT pressCambridge, MA.
6.
FelsonM. (2006). The Ecosystem for organized crime. European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations.
7.
GhoniemM.FeketeJ.-D.CastagliolaP. (2004). A comparison of the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. INFOVIS 2004 (pp. 17–24).
8.
HenryN.FeketeJ.-D.McGuffinM. J. (2007). NodeTrix: a hybrid visualization of social networks. In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), (pp. 1302–1309).
9.
HenryN.FeketeJ.-D. (2006). MatrixExplorer: A dual-representation system to explore social networks. In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5), (pp. 677–684).
10.
HenryN.FeketeJ.-D. (2007). MatLink: Enhanced matrix visualization for analyzing social networks. In BaranauskasC.PalanqueP.AbascalJ.BarbosaS. D. J. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007 (pp. 288–302). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
11.
HogarthR. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
JohnsonJ. A.ReitzelJ. D. (2011). Social network analysis in an operational environment: Defining the utility of a network approach for crime analysis using the Richmond City Police Department as a case study. In International Police Executive Symposium.
13.
KellerR.EckertC. M.ClarksonP. J. (2006). Matrices or node-link diagrams: Which visual representation is better for visualising connectivity models? In Information Visualization, 5(1), (pp. 62–76).
14.
KhuranaU.NguyenV.-A.ChengH.-C.AhnJ.ChenX.ShneidermanB. (2011). Visual analysis of temporal trends in social networks using edge color coding and metric timelines. In IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), (pp. 549–554).
15.
KleinG.PhillipsJ. K.RallE. L.PelusoD. A. (2007). A data-frame theory of sensemaking. In Expertise out of context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 113-155). New York, NY, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
KleinG. (2013). Seeing what others don’t: The remarkable ways we gain insights. New York, USA: PublicAffairs, a Member of the Perseus Book Group.
17.
KoS.AfzalS.WaltonS.YangY.ChaeJ.MalikA.JangY.ChenM.EbertD. (2014). Analyzing high-dimensional multivariate network links with integrated anomaly detection, highlighting and exploration. In IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), (pp. 83–92).
18.
PientaR.AbelloJ.KahngM.ChauD. H. (2015). Scalable graph exploration and visualization: Sensemaking challenges and opportunities. In IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), (pp. 271–278).
19.
PirolliP.CardS. (2005). The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis (Vol. 5, pp. 2–4).
20.
SeidlerP.AdderleyR. (2013). Criminal network analysis inside law enforcement agencies: A data mining system approach under the National Intelligence Model, International Journal of Police Science and Management (vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 323–337).
21.
SeidlerP.HaiderJ.KodagodaN.WongB. L. W.PohlM.AdderleyR. (2016). Design for intelligence analysis of complex systems: Evolution of criminal networks. In 2016 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC) (pp. 140–143).
22.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Vol. 8). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
XuJ.ChenH. (2005). Criminal network analysis and visualization. Communications of the ACM, 48(6), (pp. 100–107).
24.
ZhuB.WattsS.ChenH. (2010). Visualizing social network concepts. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), (pp. 151–161).
